Showing 1,940 of 1,940 total issues
Function setImagePosition
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Mapstraction.prototype.setImagePosition = function(id) {
if(this.loaded[this.api] === false) {
var me = this;
this.onload[this.api].push( function() {
me.setImagePosition(id);
Function toOpenSpace
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Polyline.prototype.toOpenSpace = function() {
var ospolyline;
var ospoints = [];
for (var i = 0, length = this.points.length ; i< length; i++){
// convert each point to OpenSpace.MapPoint
Function clonePosition
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clonePosition: function(element, source) {
var options = Object.extend({
setLeft: true,
setTop: true,
setWidth: true,
Function extend
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Element.extend = (function() {
if (Prototype.BrowserFeatures.SpecificElementExtensions)
return Prototype.K;
var Methods = { }, ByTag = Element.Methods.ByTag;
Function getElementsByClassName
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
if (!document.getElementsByClassName) document.getElementsByClassName = function(instanceMethods){
function iter(name) {
return name.blank() ? null : "[contains(concat(' ', @class, ' '), ' " + name + " ')]";
}
Method Add_Rss_item
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Add_Rss_item($item_array = null)
{
$new_rss = RSS_header();
$item_count = 0;
$rss = Load_RSS_data();
Method geoAddress
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function geoAddress($address = null)
{
//Three parts to the querystring: q is address, output is the format (
$lat = null;
$lng = null;
Function Admin_importjwm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Admin_importjwm()
{
set_time_limit();
$ch = curl_init("http://judoworldmap.com/");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function positionedOffset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
positionedOffset: function(element) {
var valueT = 0, valueL = 0;
do {
valueT += element.offsetTop || 0;
valueL += element.offsetLeft || 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setOpacity
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Element.Methods.setOpacity = function(element, value) {
element = $(element);
element.style.opacity = (value == 1) ? 0.999999 :
(value === '') ? '' : (value < 0.00001) ? 0 : value;
return element;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function writeAttribute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
writeAttribute: function(element, name, value) {
element = $(element);
var attributes = { }, t = Element._attributeTranslations.write;
if (typeof name == 'object') attributes = name;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function replace
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Element.Methods.replace = function(element, content) {
element = $(element);
if (content && content.toElement) content = content.toElement();
if (Object.isElement(content)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getStyle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getStyle: function(element, style) {
element = $(element);
style = style == 'float' ? 'cssFloat' : style.camelize();
var value = element.style[style];
if (!value || value == 'auto') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function route
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function route()
{
static $routes = array();
$nargs = func_num_args();
if( $nargs > 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function flash_now
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function flash_now($name = null, $value = null)
{
static $messages = null;
if(is_null($messages))
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function assert_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function assert_header($response, $expected_name, $expected_value = null, $message = "expected header '%s' to be equal to '%s' but received '%s: %s'")
{
test_run_assertion();
# see assert_header in http://github.com/fnando/voodoo-test/blob/f3b0994ef138a6ba94d5e7cef6c1fb1720797a86/lib/assertions.php
$headers = preg_split("/^\s*$/ms", $response);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < me.onload[api].length; i++) {
me.onload[api][i]();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < me.onload[api].length; i++) {
me.onload[api][i]();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function addImageOverlay
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Mapstraction.prototype.addImageOverlay = function(id, src, opacity, west, south, east, north) {
The parameter $view_path is not named in camelCase. Open
function before_render($content_or_func, $layout, $locals, $view_path)
{
# transform $content_or_func, $layout, $locals or $view_path…
return array($content_or_func, $layout, $locals, $view_path);
}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}