Sign upLogin

lbryio/chainquery

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 109 of 114 total issues

File claim.go has 624 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package processing

import (
    "encoding/hex"
    "encoding/json"
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/claim.go - About 5 hrs to fix

File claimtriesync.go has 556 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package jobs

import (
    "database/sql"
    "encoding/json"
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/claimtriesync.go - About 3 hrs to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func SyncTransactionValue(r *http.Request) api.Response {
    params := struct {
        Key string
    }{}
Severity: Major
Found in apiactions/validation.go and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
apiactions/validation.go on lines 16..39

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 232.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func SyncAddressBalance(r *http.Request) api.Response {
    params := struct {
        Key string
    }{}
Severity: Major
Found in apiactions/validation.go and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
apiactions/validation.go on lines 42..65

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 232.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method chainSyncStatus.alignVout has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (c *chainSyncStatus) alignVout(v lbrycrd.Vout) error {
    colsToUpdate := make([]string, 0)
    if c.Vout.Value.Float64 != v.Value {
        c.Vout.Value.SetValid(v.Value)
        colsToUpdate = append(colsToUpdate, model.OutputColumns.Value)
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/chainsync.go - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function updateSpentClaims has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func updateSpentClaims() error {
    var lastProcessed uint64
    for {
        //Claims without updates
        claims, newLastProcessed, err := getSpentClaimsToUpdate(false, lastProcessed)
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/claimtriesync.go - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function createUpdateVoutAddresses has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func createUpdateVoutAddresses(tx *model.Transaction, outputs *[]lbrycrd.Vout, blockSeconds uint64) (map[string]uint64, error) {
    addressIDMap := make(map[string]uint64)
    for _, output := range *outputs {
        address, err := getFirstAddressFromVout(output)
        if err != nil {
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/address.go - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function createUpdateVinAddresses has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func createUpdateVinAddresses(tx *model.Transaction, inputs *[]lbrycrd.Vin, blockSeconds uint64) (map[string]uint64, error) {
    addressIDMap := make(map[string]uint64)
    for _, input := range *inputs {
        srcOutput := datastore.GetOutput(input.TxID, uint(input.Vout))
        if srcOutput == nil {
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/address.go - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function ProcessVin has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func ProcessVin(jsonVin *lbrycrd.Vin, tx *m.Transaction, txDC *txDebitCredits, n uint64) error {
    defer metrics.Processing(time.Now(), "vin")
    isVinCoinbase := len(jsonVin.Coinbase) > 0
    vin := &m.Input{
        TransactionID:   tx.ID,
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/outpoint.go - About 1 hr to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func GetSupport(txHash string, vout uint) *model.Support {
    defer util.TimeTrack(time.Now(), "GetSupport", "mysqlprofile")
    txHashMatch := qm.Where(model.SupportColumns.TransactionHashID+"=?", txHash)
    voutMatch := qm.Where(model.SupportColumns.Vout+"=?", vout)
    support, err := model.Supports(txHashMatch, voutMatch).OneG()
Severity: Major
Found in datastore/datastore.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
datastore/datastore.go on lines 18..30

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

func GetOutput(txHash string, vout uint) *model.Output {
    defer util.TimeTrack(time.Now(), "GetOutput", "mysqlprofile")
    txHashMatch := qm.Where(model.OutputColumns.TransactionHash+"=?", txHash)
    vOutMatch := qm.And(model.OutputColumns.Vout+"=?", vout)
    output, err := model.Outputs(txHashMatch, vOutMatch).OneG()
Severity: Major
Found in datastore/datastore.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
datastore/datastore.go on lines 251..263

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 176.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function ProcessVout has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func ProcessVout(jsonVout *lbrycrd.Vout, tx *m.Transaction, txDC *txDebitCredits, blockHeight uint64) error {
    defer metrics.Processing(time.Now(), "vout")
    vout := &m.Output{}
    foundVout := ds.GetOutput(tx.Hash, uint(jsonVout.N))
    if foundVout != nil {
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/outpoint.go - About 1 hr to fix

Function fixOutputs has 63 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func fixOutputs() error {
    wg := sync.WaitGroup{}
    spentClaimsChan := make(chan *model.Claim, 100)
    errorsChan := make(chan error, runtime.NumCPU())
    c := model.ClaimColumns
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/outputfixsync.go - About 1 hr to fix

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

type GetBlockVerboseResponse struct {
    Hash              string        `json:"hash"`
    Confirmations     int64         `json:"confirmations"`
    StrippedSize      int32         `json:"strippedsize"`
    Size              int32         `json:"size"`
Severity: Major
Found in lbrycrd/reponse.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lbrycrd/reponse.go on lines 46..67

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 158.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

type GetBlockResponse struct {
    Hash              string   `json:"hash"`
    Confirmations     uint64   `json:"confirmations"`
    StrippedSize      int32    `json:"strippedsize"`
    Size              int32    `json:"size"`
Severity: Major
Found in lbrycrd/reponse.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lbrycrd/reponse.go on lines 72..93

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 158.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function processClaimNameScript has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func processClaimNameScript(script *[]byte, vout model.Output, tx model.Transaction, blockHeight uint64) (name string, claimid string, pkscript []byte, err error) {
    claimid, err = util.ClaimIDFromOutpoint(vout.TransactionHash, int(vout.Vout))
    if err != nil {
        return name, "", pkscript, err
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/claim.go - About 1 hr to fix

Method chainSyncStatus.alignBlock has 59 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (c *chainSyncStatus) alignBlock(l *lbrycrd.GetBlockResponse) error {
    colsToUpdate := make([]string, 0)
    if c.Block.Hash != l.Hash {
        c.Block.Hash = l.Hash
        colsToUpdate = append(colsToUpdate, model.BlockColumns.Hash)
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/chainsync.go - About 1 hr to fix

Function ValidateChainRange has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func ValidateChainRange(from, to *uint64) ([]BlockData, error) {

    if from == nil {
        start := uint64(0)
        from = &start
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/jobs/chainvalidation.go - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function setChannelMetadata has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func setChannelMetadata(claim *model.Claim, channel pb.Channel) {
    claim.Type.SetValid(global.ChannelClaimType)
    if channel.GetCover() != nil {
        c := channel.GetCover()
        if c.GetName() != "" {
Severity: Minor
Found in daemon/processing/claim.go - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function ClaimEvent has 56 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func ClaimEvent(claim *model.Claim, tx model.Transaction, claimData *c.StakeHelper) {
    values := url.Values{}
    values.Add("claim_id", claim.ClaimID)
    values.Add("name", claim.Name)
    if !claim.Type.IsZero() {
Severity: Minor
Found in notifications/events.go - About 1 hr to fix
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language