File import-scanner.ts
has 1234 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import assert from "assert";
import {inspect} from "util";
import {Script} from "vm";
import {
isString, isObject, isEmpty, has, keys, each, omit,
ImportScanner
has 34 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default class ImportScanner {
public name: string;
private bundleArch: string;
private sourceRoot: string;
Function resolvePkgJsonBrowserAliases
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private resolvePkgJsonBrowserAliases(pkgFile: File) {
if (! this.isWeb()) {
return;
}
Function scanMissingModules
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
scanMissingModules(missingModules: MissingMap) {
assert.ok(missingModules);
assert.ok(typeof missingModules === "object");
assert.ok(! Array.isArray(missingModules));
Function getSourceRootAbsModuleId
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private getSourceRootAbsModuleId(absPath: string) {
const relPath = pathRelative(this.sourceRoot, absPath);
if (relPath.startsWith("..")) {
// absPath is not a subdirectory of this.sourceRoot.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function scanFile
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private scanFile(file: File, forDynamicImport = false) {
if (file.imported === "static") {
// If we've already scanned this file non-dynamically, then we don't
// need to scan it again.
return;
Function combineFiles
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private combineFiles(oldFile: File, newFile: File) {
const scanner = this;
function checkProperty(name: "lazy" | "bare") {
if (has(oldFile, name)) {
Function getSourcePath
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private getSourcePath(file: File) {
let sourcePath = file.sourcePath;
if (sourcePath) {
if (pathIsAbsolute(sourcePath)) {
let relPath: string | undefined;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function combineFiles
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private combineFiles(oldFile: File, newFile: File) {
const scanner = this;
function checkProperty(name: "lazy" | "bare") {
if (has(oldFile, name)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkSourceAndTargetPaths
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private checkSourceAndTargetPaths(file: File) {
file.sourcePath = this.getSourcePath(file);
if (! isString(file.targetPath)) {
return;
Function onMissing
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private onMissing(
parentFile: File,
id: string,
forDynamicImport = false,
): Resolution | FileAlias {
Function getSourceRootAbsModuleId
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private getSourceRootAbsModuleId(absPath: string) {
const relPath = pathRelative(this.sourceRoot, absPath);
if (relPath.startsWith("..")) {
// absPath is not a subdirectory of this.sourceRoot.
Function realPath
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private realPath(absPath: string) {
if (has(this.realPathCache, absPath)) {
return this.realPathCache[absPath];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readModule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readModule(absPath: string): RawFile | null {
const dotExt = pathExtname(absPath).toLowerCase();
if (dotExt === ".node") {
const dataString = "throw new Error(" + JSON.stringify(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readDepFile
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readDepFile(absPath: string): File | null {
const absModuleId = this.getAbsModuleId(absPath);
if (! absModuleId) {
// The given path cannot be installed on this architecture.
return null;
Function readModule
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readModule(absPath: string): RawFile | null {
const dotExt = pathExtname(absPath).toLowerCase();
if (dotExt === ".node") {
const dataString = "throw new Error(" + JSON.stringify(
Function shouldUseNode
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private shouldUseNode(absModuleId: string, absPath: string) {
if (this.isWeb()) {
// Node should never be used in a browser, obviously.
return false;
}
Function realPath
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private realPath(absPath: string) {
if (has(this.realPathCache, absPath)) {
return this.realPathCache[absPath];
}
Function resolve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private resolve(
parentFile: File,
id: string,
forDynamicImport = false,
): Resolution | FileAlias {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function shouldUseNode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private shouldUseNode(absModuleId: string, absPath: string) {
if (this.isWeb()) {
// Node should never be used in a browser, obviously.
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addPkgJsonToOutput
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private addPkgJsonToOutput(
pkgJsonPath: string,
pkg: Record<string, any>,
forDynamicImport = false,
): File {
Function resolve
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private resolve(
parentFile: File,
id: string,
forDynamicImport = false,
): Resolution | FileAlias {
Function constructor
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor({
name,
bundleArch,
extensions,
sourceRoot,
Function onMissing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private onMissing(
parentFile: File,
id: string,
forDynamicImport = false,
): Resolution | FileAlias {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readDepFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private readDepFile(absPath: string): File | null {
const absModuleId = this.getAbsModuleId(absPath);
if (! absModuleId) {
// The given path cannot be installed on this architecture.
return null;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function scanFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private scanFile(file: File, forDynamicImport = false) {
if (file.imported === "static") {
// If we've already scanned this file non-dynamically, then we don't
// need to scan it again.
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function addFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private addFile(absPath: string, file: File): File | null {
if (! file || file[fakeSymbol]) {
// Return file without adding it to this.outputFiles.
return file;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function reifyCompileWithCache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const reifyCompileWithCache = Profile("reifyCompileWithCache", wrap(function (
source,
_hash,
bundleArch,
cacheFilePath,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkSourceAndTargetPaths
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private checkSourceAndTargetPaths(file: File) {
file.sourcePath = this.getSourcePath(file);
if (! isString(file.targetPath)) {
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ensureLeadingSlash(relPath);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return false;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.realPathCache[absPath] = absPath;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return ensureLeadingSlash(relPath);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
var info = this.readFile(absPath);
} catch (e: any) {
if (e.code !== "ENOENT") throw e;
return null;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
var info = this.readFile(absPath);
} catch (e: any) {
if (e.code !== "ENOENT") throw e;
return null;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76