Showing 97 of 97 total issues
Function split_dataset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def split_dataset(dataset,splits):
""" Inputs: A torchvision.dataset DATASET and a dictionary SPLITS
containing fractions or number of elements for each of the new datasets.
Allows values (0,1] or (1,N] or -1 to fill with remaining.
Example {'train':-1,'val':.1} will create a (.9, .1) split of the dataset.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function unflatten
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def unflatten(d,sep='/'):
"""Take a dictionary with keys {'k1/k2/k3':v} to {'k1':{'k2':{'k3':v}}}
as outputted by flatten """
out_dict={}
for k,v in d.items():
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function makeTrainer
has 15 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def makeTrainer(*,dataset=CIFAR10,network=layer13,num_epochs=100,
Function __init__
has 13 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1,bias=True, eps=1e-2, n_iter=5, momentum=0.1, mode=4, num_groups=16,debug=False):
Function makeTrainer
has 13 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def makeTrainer(*,dataset=CIFAR10,network=layer13,num_epochs=200,
Function makeTrainer
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def makeTrainer(*,gen=resnetgan.Generator,disc=resnetgan.Discriminator,
Function __init__
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=1, padding=0, dilation=1,bias=True, eps=1e-2, n_iter=5, momentum=0.1, num_groups=16,sampling_stride=3):
Function makeTrainer
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def makeTrainer(*,gen=cgan.Generator,disc=cgan.Discriminator,
Function _find_images_and_annotation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _find_images_and_annotation(root_dir):
images = {}
attr = None
assert os.path.exists(root_dir), "{} not exists".format(root_dir)
for root, _, fnames in sorted(os.walk(root_dir)):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __call__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __call__(self,cfg,i=None):
try:
cfg.pop('local_rank',None) #TODO: properly handle distributed
resume = cfg.pop('resume',False)
save = cfg.pop('save',False)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _process_worker
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process_worker(call_queue, result_queue,gpu_set,gpu_pool):
"""Evaluates calls from call_queue and places the results in result_queue.
This worker is run in a separate process.
Args:
call_queue: A multiprocessing.Queue of _CallItems that will be read and
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _sample_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _sample_config(config_spec,cfg_all):
cfg = {}
more_work = False
for k,v in config_spec.items():
if isinstance(v,dict):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __init__
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, numClasses=10):
super().__init__()
self.numClasses = numClasses
self.activation = nn.LeakyReLU(0.1)
self.conv1a = nn.Conv2d(3, 96, 3, padding=1)
Function __init__
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, num_targets=10):
super().__init__()
self.numClasses = num_targets
self.activation = nn.LeakyReLU(0.1)
self.conv1a = weight_norm(nn.Conv2d(3, 128, 3, padding=1))
Function __init__
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, numClasses=10):
super().__init__()
self.numClasses = numClasses
self.activation = nn.LeakyReLU(0.1)
self.conv1a = weight_norm(nn.Conv2d(3, 96, 3, padding=1))
Function __init__
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, model, dataloaders, opt_constr=optim.Adam, lr_sched = lambda e: 1,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(self, size):
if isinstance(size, numbers.Number):
self.size = (int(size), int(size))
else:
self.size = size
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if isinstance(size, numbers.Number):
self.size = (int(size), int(size))
else:
self.size = size
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _add_call_item_to_queue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _add_call_item_to_queue(pending_work_items,
work_ids,
call_queue):
"""Fills call_queue with _WorkItems from pending_work_items.
This function never blocks.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function process_user_input
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_user_input(self,executor):
inp = maybe_get_input()
if inp is None: return
if inp[:4]=="halt":pass
elif inp[:3]=="add":
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"