Showing 337 of 337 total issues
Function manageParticipation
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dom,
container,
padDoc,
subject,
me,
Function predicateLabelForXML
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function predicateLabelForXML (p, inverse) {
var lab
if (inverse) {
// If we know an inverse predicate, use its label
var ip = UI.store.any(p, UI.ns.owl('inverseOf'))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function renderPartipants
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UI.pad.renderPartipants = function (dom, table, padDoc, subject, me, options) {
Function findAppInstances
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function findAppInstances (
context: AuthenticationContext,
klass: $rdf.NamedNode,
isPublic: boolean
): Promise<AuthenticationContext> {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function makeACLGraphbyCombo
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
kb: $rdf.IndexedFormula,
x: $rdf.NamedNode,
byCombo: ComboList,
aclDoc: $rdf.NamedNode,
main?: boolean,
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (p in possibleProperties.dp) possible.push(kb.fromNT(p))
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!b[pred][agent] || !b[pred][agent][mode]) {
return false
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (!b[pred][ag]) b[pred][ag] = []
Function makeSelectForNestedCategory
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dom,
kb,
subject,
category,
store,
Function attachmentList
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buttons.attachmentList = function (dom, subject, div, options) {
options = options || {}
var doc = options.doc || subject.doc()
if (options.modify === undefined) options.modify = true
var modify = options.modify
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function makeDescription
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dom,
kb,
subject,
predicate,
store,
Function makeSelectForCategory
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dom,
kb,
subject,
category,
store,
Function makeSelectForCategory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
forms.makeSelectForCategory = function (
dom,
kb,
subject,
category,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function preventBrowserDropEvents
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function preventBrowserDropEvents (document: HTMLDocument): void {
console.log('preventBrowserDropEvents called.')
const global: any = window
if (typeof global !== 'undefined') {
if (global.preventBrowserDropEventsDone) return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
widgets.appendForm(
dom,
prefContainer,
{},
participation,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
widgets.appendForm(
dom,
prefContainer,
{},
sharedPreferences,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
(y > ele.dataValueNT && options && options.yDecreasing) ||
(y < ele.dataValueNT && !(options && options.yDecreasing))
) {
return matrix.insertBefore(tr, ele) // return the tr
Function exports
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function (dom, kb, subject, messageStore, options) {
Function notepad
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
UI.pad.notepad = function (dom, padDoc, subject, me, options) {
Function renderMessage
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
messageTable,
bindings,
fresh,
options,
userContext