mongodb/bson-ruby

View on GitHub
perf/bench_test.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File bench_test.rb has 716 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

$:.unshift(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), '..', 'lib'))
require 'bson'
require 'json'
require 'stringio'
require 'test/unit'
Severity: Major
Found in perf/bench_test.rb - About 1 day to fix

    Class BenchTest has 58 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class BenchTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
      RESET = 'reset'
      NON_ZERO_TIME = 0.0000000001 # 10^-10
    
      def setup
    Severity: Major
    Found in perf/bench_test.rb - About 1 day to fix

      Method test_to_bson_object_allocation has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def test_to_bson_object_allocation
          count = 1_000_000
          t = Time.now
          expression = [
            Array[1],
      Severity: Minor
      Found in perf/bench_test.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

              when 'String'; return
        Severity: Major
        Found in perf/bench_test.rb - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                when 'TrueClass'; return
          Severity: Major
          Found in perf/bench_test.rb - About 30 mins to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def test_hash_string_to_bson_hint # to check overhead of hint setting and passing
                size = 1024
                hash = Hash[*(0..size).to_a.collect{|i| [ ('a' + i.to_s), i.to_s]}.flatten]
                method_label_pairs = [
                    [ method(:old_hash_to_bson_no_hint), 'Hash string to_bson no hint', RESET ],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in perf/bench_test.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
            perf/bench_test.rb on lines 653..660

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 40.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def test_seek
                size = 1
                hash = Hash[*(0..size).to_a.collect{|i| [ ('a' + i.to_s), i.to_s]}.flatten]
                method_label_pairs = [
                    [ method(:old_hash_from_bson), 'Encode bson optimize none', RESET ],
            Severity: Minor
            Found in perf/bench_test.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
            perf/bench_test.rb on lines 447..454

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 40.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                htms, allocated = gc_allocated do
                  tms = Benchmark.measure(label) do
                    count.times.each_with_index {|i| yield i }
                  end
                  Hash[*[:label, :utime, :stime, :cutime, :cstime, :real].zip(tms.to_a).flatten]
            Severity: Minor
            Found in perf/bench_test.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
            perf/bench_test.rb on lines 71..77

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 34.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                  htms, allocated = gc_allocated do
                    tms = Benchmark.measure(label) do
                      count.times.each_with_index {|i| yield i }
                    end
                    Hash[*[:label, :utime, :stime, :cutime, :cstime, :real].zip(tms.to_a).flatten]
            Severity: Minor
            Found in perf/bench_test.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
            perf/bench_test.rb on lines 262..268

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 34.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status