Sign upLogin

mtrevisan/HunLinter

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 338 of 403 total issues

Method applyCompound has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    protected final List<Inflection> applyCompound(final List<List<List<Inflection>>> entries, final int limit){
        final String compoundFlag = affixData.getCompoundFlag();
        final String forbiddenWordFlag = affixData.getForbiddenWordFlag();
        final String forceCompoundUppercaseFlag = affixData.getForceCompoundUppercaseFlag();
        final boolean checkCompoundReplacement = affixData.isCheckCompoundReplacement();
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorCompound.java - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method checkValidity has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void checkValidity(final AffixType parentType, final AffixType type, final String parentFlag, final String flag,
            final String removal, final String line, final int index){
        if(parentType != type)
            throw new LinterException(WRONG_TYPE, parentType, type, line);
        if(parentFlag != null && !parentFlag.equals(flag))
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/vos/AffixEntry.java - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

/**
 * Copyright (c) 2019-2022 Mauro Trevisan
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
 * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/ThesaurusLinterAction.java and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/AutoCorrectLinterAction.java on lines 1..107
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/DictionaryLinterAction.java on lines 1..108

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 204.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

/**
 * Copyright (c) 2019-2022 Mauro Trevisan
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
 * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/AutoCorrectLinterAction.java and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/DictionaryLinterAction.java on lines 1..108
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/ThesaurusLinterAction.java on lines 1..107

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 204.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

/**
 * Copyright (c) 2019-2022 Mauro Trevisan
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
 * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/DictionaryLinterAction.java and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/AutoCorrectLinterAction.java on lines 1..107
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/ThesaurusLinterAction.java on lines 1..107

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 204.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

/**
 * Copyright (c) 2019-2022 Mauro Trevisan
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
 * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/DictionaryWordCountAction.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/HyphenationLinterAction.java on lines 1..108

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 202.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

/**
 * Copyright (c) 2019-2022 Mauro Trevisan
 *
 * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
 * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/HyphenationLinterAction.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/actions/DictionaryWordCountAction.java on lines 1..108

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 202.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method canApplyToSuffix has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @SuppressWarnings("IfStatementMissingBreakInLoop")
    private boolean canApplyToSuffix(final String word){
        if(word.endsWith(condition))
            return true;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/vos/AffixEntry.java - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method hasNeedAffixFlag has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static boolean hasNeedAffixFlag(final Inflection inflection, final String needAffixFlag){
        boolean hasNeedAffixFlag = false;
        final AffixEntry[] appliedRules = inflection.getAppliedRules();
        if(appliedRules.length > 0){
            //check that last suffix and last prefix don't have the needaffix flag
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorBase.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method createHyphenatedWord has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static List<String> createHyphenatedWord(final String word, final HyphenationBreak hyphBreak){
        int startIndex = 0;
        int after = 0;
        String addAfter = null;
        final int size = word.length();
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/hyphenation/Hyphenator.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method canApplyToPrefix has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @SuppressWarnings("IfStatementMissingBreakInLoop")
    private boolean canApplyToPrefix(final String word){
        if(word.startsWith(condition))
            return true;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/vos/AffixEntry.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mergeSimilarRules has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static void mergeSimilarRules(final Collection<LineEntry> rules, final Comparator<String> comparator){
        final Map<String, List<LineEntry>> similarityBucket = SetHelper.bucket(rules,
            rule -> (rule.condition.contains(RegexHelper.GROUP_END)
                ? rule.removal + TAB + rule.addition + TAB + RegexSequencer.splitSequence(rule.condition)[0] + TAB
                + RegexSequencer.splitSequence(rule.condition).length
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/RulesReducer.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method calculateDictionaryBoundaries has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void calculateDictionaryBoundaries(){
        boundaries.clear();
        try(final Scanner scanner = FileHelper.createScanner(dicFile.toPath(), charset)){
            ParserHelper.assertLinesCount(scanner);
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/DictionaryParser.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public final void parse(final File hypFile){
        final Path hypPath = hypFile.toPath();
        Level level = Level.NON_COMPOUND;
        charset = FileHelper.determineCharset(hypPath, -1);
        LOGGER.info(ParserManager.MARKER_APPLICATION, "The charset of the Hyphenation file is {}", charset.name());
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/hyphenation/HyphenationParser.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for(int i = 0; i < rules.size(); i ++){
                final String elem = rules.get(i);
                if(elem.length() == 1)
                    letter = elem.charAt(0);
                else{
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/languages/RulesLoader.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/languages/RulesLoader.java on lines 132..146

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 148.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for(int i = 0; i < rules.size(); i ++){
                final String elem = rules.get(i);
                if(elem.length() == 1)
                    letter = elem.charAt(0);
                else{
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/languages/RulesLoader.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/languages/RulesLoader.java on lines 157..171

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 148.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method applyAffixRules has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private List<Inflection> applyAffixRules(final DictionaryEntry dicEntry, final List<List<String>> allAffixes,
            final boolean isCompound, final RuleEntry overriddenRule) throws NoApplicableRuleException{
        final String circumfixFlag = affixData.getCircumfixFlag();
        final String forbiddenWordFlag = affixData.getForbiddenWordFlag();
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorBase.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @SuppressWarnings("OverlyBroadThrowsClause")
    public final void parse(final File affFile, final String configurationLanguage) throws IOException{
        clear();

        int index = 0;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/affix/AffixParser.java - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

   private void addButtonActionPerformed(final java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {//GEN-FIRST:event_addButtonActionPerformed
      try{
         final String exception = textField.getText().trim();
         if(!parserManager.getSexParser().contains(exception)){
            parserManager.getSexParser().modify(ExceptionsParser.TagChangeType.ADD, Collections.singletonList(exception));
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 197..223

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 142.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

   private void addButtonActionPerformed(final java.awt.event.ActionEvent evt) {//GEN-FIRST:event_addButtonActionPerformed
      try{
         final String exception = textField.getText().trim();
         if(!parserManager.getWexParser().contains(exception)){
            parserManager.getWexParser().modify(ExceptionsParser.TagChangeType.ADD, Collections.singletonList(exception));
Severity: Major
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 195..221

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 142.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language