Sign upLogin

mtrevisan/HunLinter

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 338 of 403 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void removeTwofolds(final Iterable<Inflection> prods){
        final String circumfixFlag = affixData.getCircumfixFlag();
        if(circumfixFlag != null){
            final Iterator<Inflection> itr = prods.iterator();
            while(itr.hasNext()){
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorCompound.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorBase.java on lines 211..221

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 68.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void enforceCircumfix(final Iterable<Inflection> inflections){
        final String circumfixFlag = affixData.getCircumfixFlag();
        if(circumfixFlag != null){
            final Iterator<Inflection> itr = inflections.iterator();
            while(itr.hasNext()){
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorBase.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorCompound.java on lines 310..320

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 68.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    static{
        final EnumSet<InflectionTag> tags = EnumSet.allOf(InflectionTag.class);
        final Map<String, InflectionTag> map = new HashMap<>(tags.size());
        for(final InflectionTag tag : tags)
            map.put(MorphologicalTag.INFLECTIONAL_SUFFIX.getCode() + tag.code, tag);
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/enums/InflectionTag.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/enums/PartOfSpeechTag.java on lines 114..120

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 68.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        for(int lineIndex = (workerData.isNoHeader()? 0: 1); lineIndex < lines.size(); lineIndex ++){
            final String line = lines.get(lineIndex);
            if(ParserHelper.isDictionaryComment(line))
                continue;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/core/WorkerDictionary.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/core/WorkerDictionary.java on lines 87..93

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 68.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        for(int lineIndex = (workerData.isNoHeader()? 0: 1); lineIndex < lines.size(); lineIndex ++){
            final String line = lines.get(lineIndex);
            if(ParserHelper.isDictionaryComment(line))
                continue;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/core/WorkerDictionary.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/core/WorkerDictionary.java on lines 126..132

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 68.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @EventHandler
    @SuppressWarnings({"unused", "NumberEquality"})
    public final void clear(final Integer actionCommand){
        if(actionCommand != MainFrame.ACTION_COMMAND_GUI_CLEAR_ALL && actionCommand != MainFrame.ACTION_COMMAND_GUI_CLEAR_WORD_EXCEPTIONS)
            return;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 238..250

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 66.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    @EventHandler
    @SuppressWarnings({"unused", "NumberEquality"})
    public final void clear(final Integer actionCommand){
        if(actionCommand != MainFrame.ACTION_COMMAND_GUI_CLEAR_ALL && actionCommand != MainFrame.ACTION_COMMAND_GUI_CLEAR_SENTENCE_EXCEPTIONS)
            return;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 239..251

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 66.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public final void parse(final ParsingContext context) throws EOFException{
        final Scanner scanner = context.getScanner();
        if(!NumberUtils.isCreatable(context.getFirstParameter()))
            throw new LinterException(BAD_FIRST_PARAMETER, context);
        final int numEntries = Integer.parseInt(context.getFirstParameter());
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/affix/RelationTable.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method emitArc has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private int emitArc(final OutputStream os, final int flags, final byte label, final int targetOffset) throws IOException{
        int length = 0;

        final int labelIndex = invertedLabelsIndex[label & 0xFF];
        if(labelIndex > 0){
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/datastructures/fsa/serializers/CFSASerializer.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method manageInside has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static void manageInside(final Map<Integer, IndexDataPair<String>> indexesAndRules, final List<String> syllabes,
            final CharSequence nohyp, final int wordLength){
        final int nohypLength = nohyp.length();

        int index = 0;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/hyphenation/HyphenationBreak.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method retrieveAdditionsToBeRemoved has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static List<String> retrieveAdditionsToBeRemoved(final Collection<LineEntry> rules, final LineEntry rule,
            final Collection<LineEntry> temporaryRules, final Map<String, List<String>> lcss, final List<String> keys){
        final List<String> additionsToBeRemoved = new ArrayList<>(0);
        for(int i = 0; i < keys.size(); i ++){
            final String key = keys.get(i);
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/RulesReducer.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method haveIdenticalGlyphs has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static boolean haveIdenticalGlyphs(final Font font, final float maxDifferenceThreshold, final char... chrs){
        final BufferedImage[] glyphs = new BufferedImage[chrs.length];
        glyphs[0] = renderImage(font, chrs[0]);
        for(int i = 0; i < chrs.length - 1; i ++)
            for(int j = i + 1; j < chrs.length; j ++){
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/GlyphComparator.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method compactInflections has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static LineEntry compactInflections(final List<LineEntry> rules){
        if(rules.size() > 1){
            //retrieve rule with the longest condition (all the other conditions must be this long)
            LineEntry maxConditionEntry = null;
            int maxConditionLength = 0;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/RulesReducer.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method containsTriple has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private static boolean containsTriple(final StringBuffer sb, final String compound){
        boolean repeated = false;
        final int size = sb.length() - 1;
        if(size > 1){
            final String interCompounds = sb.substring(Math.max(size - 1, 0), size + 1)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/parsers/dictionary/generators/WordGeneratorCompound.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method browse has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @SuppressWarnings("UseOfProcessBuilder")
    public static boolean browse(File file) throws IOException, InterruptedException{
        if(file.isFile())
            file = file.getParentFile();
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/services/system/FileHelper.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method determineCharset has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static Charset determineCharset(final Path path, final int limitLinesRead){
        String fileCharsetName = null;
        for(final Charset cs : HUNSPELL_CHARSETS){
            try(final BufferedReader reader = Files.newBufferedReader(path, cs)){
                if(fileCharsetName == null)
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/services/system/FileHelper.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for(int i = 0; i < bound; i ++){
                final char chr = correctForm.charAt(i);
                if(!Character.isLetter(chr) && !Character.isWhitespace(chr)){
                    correctWordContainsSpecialChars = true;
                    break;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/autocorrect/AutoCorrectLinterWorker.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/autocorrect/AutoCorrectLinterFSAWorker.java on lines 74..80

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            for(int i = 0; i < bound; i ++){
                final char chr = correctForm.charAt(i);
                if(!Character.isLetter(chr) && !Character.isWhitespace(chr)){
                    correctWordContainsSpecialChars = true;
                    break;
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/autocorrect/AutoCorrectLinterFSAWorker.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/workers/autocorrect/AutoCorrectLinterWorker.java on lines 91..97

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      tagPanel = new TagPanel((changeType, tags) -> {
         final ExceptionsParser sexParser = parserManager.getSexParser();
         sexParser.modify(changeType, tags);
         try{
            sexParser.save(packager.getSentenceExceptionsFile());
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 100..109

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      tagPanel = new TagPanel((changeType, tags) -> {
         final ExceptionsParser wexParser = parserManager.getWexParser();
         wexParser.modify(changeType, tags);
         try{
            wexParser.save(packager.getWordExceptionsFile());
Severity: Minor
Found in src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/WordExceptionsLayeredPane.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
src/main/java/io/github/mtrevisan/hunlinter/gui/panes/SentenceExceptionsLayeredPane.java on lines 100..109

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language