Sign upLogin

notifme/notifme-sdk

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 333 of 333 total issues

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/whatsapp/infobip.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/push/adm.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/push/notificationCatcher.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/sender.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function send has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
    const { id, userId, from, to, text, type, nature } =
      request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
    const response = await fetch('https://api.callr.com/rest/v1.1/sms', {
      method: 'POST',
Severity: Minor
Found in src/providers/sms/callr.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/email/mandrill.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/notificationCatcherProvider.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function send has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  async send (request: EmailRequestType): Promise<string> {
    const { id, userId, from, replyTo, subject, html, text, headers, to, cc, bcc, attachments } =
      request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
    const response = await fetch('https://api.sparkpost.com/api/v1/transmissions', {
      method: 'POST',
Severity: Minor
Found in src/providers/email/sparkpost.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/whatsapp/notificationCatcher.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/email/sparkpost.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function send has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  async send (request: SmsRequestType): Promise<string> {
    const { from, to, text } = request.customize ? (await request.customize(this.id, request)) : request
    const response = await fetch('https://api.infobip.com/sms/1/text/single', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: {
Severity: Minor
Found in src/providers/sms/infobip.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/sms/clickatell.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/email/sendgrid.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/providers/push/wns.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        var _ref, id, userId, from, replyTo, subject, html, text, headers, to, cc, bcc, attachments, form, response, responseBody;
Severity: Major
Found in lib/providers/email/mailgun.js and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
lib/providers/email/mandrill.js on lines 36..36
lib/providers/voice/twilio.js on lines 30..30

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (response.ok) {
      return responseBody.id
    } else {
      throw new Error(`${response.status} - ${responseBody.message}`)
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/providers/email/mailgun.js and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
src/providers/sms/twilio.js on lines 37..41
src/providers/voice/twilio.js on lines 58..62

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        var _ref2, from, to, url, method, fallbackUrl, fallbackMethod, statusCallback, statusCallbackEvent, sendDigits, machineDetection, machineDetectionTimeout, timeout, form, response, responseBody;
Severity: Major
Found in lib/providers/voice/twilio.js and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
lib/providers/email/mailgun.js on lines 31..31
lib/providers/email/mandrill.js on lines 36..36

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Function _objectSpread has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

function _objectSpread(e) { for (var r = 1; r < arguments.length; r++) { var t = null != arguments[r] ? arguments[r] : {}; r % 2 ? ownKeys(Object(t), !0).forEach(function (r) { (0, _defineProperty2["default"])(e, r, t[r]); }) : _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors ? _Object$defineProperties(e, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)) : ownKeys(Object(t)).forEach(function (r) { _Object$defineProperty(e, r, _Object$getOwnPropertyDescriptor(t, r)); }); } return e; }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/index.js - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          if (typeof value === 'undefined' || value === null || typeof value.toString !== 'function') {
            throw new Error('Header ' + key + ' contains invalid value');
          }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/util/aws/v4.js and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
src/util/aws/v4.js on lines 103..105

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if (response.ok) {
      return responseBody.sid
    } else {
      throw new Error(`${response.status} - ${responseBody.message}`)
    }
Severity: Major
Found in src/providers/voice/twilio.js and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
src/providers/email/mailgun.js on lines 52..56
src/providers/sms/twilio.js on lines 37..41

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 50.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language