Showing 17 of 23 total issues
Function TypeHelper$conceal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.conceal = function TypeHelper$conceal( instance, userClass, clone, concealWith ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TypeHelper$omitHidden
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitHidden = function TypeHelper$omitHidden( instance, userClass, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TypeHelper$omitReadOnly
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitReadOnly = function TypeHelper$omitReadOnly( instance, userClass, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function( grunt ) {
// Project configuration.
grunt.initConfig(
{
Function TypeHelper$conceal
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.conceal = function TypeHelper$conceal( instance, userClass, clone, concealWith ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
Function TypeHelper$omitHidden
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitHidden = function TypeHelper$omitHidden( instance, userClass, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
Function TypeHelper$omitReadOnly
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitReadOnly = function TypeHelper$omitReadOnly( instance, userClass, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
userClass = "undefined" === typeof userClass ? TypeInfo.USERCLASS_USER : userClass;
Function TypeHelper$omitNull
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitNull = function TypeHelper$omitNull( instance, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
var targetInstance = clone ? _.clone( instance ) : instance;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function assemble
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function assemble( typeName, collectionName, typeDescription ) {
// Only import mongoose if this module is actually used.
var mongoose = require( "mongoose" );
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
Function TypeHelper$reduceComplex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.reduceComplex = function TypeHelper$reduceComplex( instance, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
var targetInstance = clone ? _.clone( instance ) : instance;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function internalDecorate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function internalDecorate( typeDescription, propertyName, userClass, attribute ) {
if( propertyName && Array.isArray( typeDescription[ propertyName ] ) ) {
internalDecorate( typeDescription[ propertyName ], 0, userClass, attribute );
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TypeHelper$omitNull
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.omitNull = function TypeHelper$omitNull( instance, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
var targetInstance = clone ? _.clone( instance ) : instance;
Function TypeDecorator$decorateComposite
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeDecorator.prototype.decorateComposite = function TypeDecorator$decorateComposite( compositeName, userClass, attribute ) {
// Refuse to decorate existing properties on the type, unless it's a composite
if( this.typeDescription[ compositeName ] ) {
if( !this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__ ||
( this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__ && -1 === this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__.indexOf( compositeName ) ) ) {
Function TypeHelper$reduceComplex
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeHelper.prototype.reduceComplex = function TypeHelper$reduceComplex( instance, clone ) {
if( !instance ) {
return instance;
}
var targetInstance = clone ? _.clone( instance ) : instance;
Function TypeDecorator$decorateComposite
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TypeDecorator.prototype.decorateComposite = function TypeDecorator$decorateComposite( compositeName, userClass, attribute ) {
// Refuse to decorate existing properties on the type, unless it's a composite
if( this.typeDescription[ compositeName ] ) {
if( !this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__ ||
( this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__ && -1 === this.typeDescription.__COMPOSITES__.indexOf( compositeName ) ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function TypeInfo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function TypeInfo( typeName, typeDescription ) {
// An identifier that is supposed to uniquely identify the type being described.
this.typeName = typeName.toLowerCase();
this.typeDescription = typeDescription;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null;