Showing 36 of 36 total issues
Method schemaGenerator.generateDeclaredType
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateDeclaredType(
t *schemas.Type, scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if decl, ok := g.output.declsBySchema[t]; ok {
return &codegen.NamedType{Decl: decl}, nil
Function PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType(
jsType,
format string,
pointer,
minIntSize bool,
Method schemaGenerator.generateTypeInline
has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateTypeInline(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
two := 2
Function PrimitiveTypeFromJSONSchemaType
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jsType,
format string,
pointer,
minIntSize bool,
minimum **float64,
Method schemaGenerator.generateDeclaredType
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateDeclaredType(
t *schemas.Type, scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if decl, ok := g.output.declsBySchema[t]; ok {
return &codegen.NamedType{Decl: decl}, nil
Method HTTPLoader.Load
has 6 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (l *HTTPLoader) Load(uri, parentURI string) (*Schema, error) {
u, err := url.Parse(uri)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse url: %w", err)
}
Method numericValidator.genBoundary
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
out *codegen.Emitter,
checkPointer,
pointerPrefix,
value string,
boundary *float64,
Function QualifiedFileName
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func QualifiedFileName(fileName, parentFileName string, resolveExtensions []string) (string, error) {
r, err := GetRefType(fileName)
if err != nil {
return "", err
}
Method Package.Generate
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (p *Package) Generate(out *Emitter) {
out.Comment(p.Comment)
out.Printlnf("package %s", p.Name())
if len(p.Imports) > 0 {
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ext := t.GoJSONSchemaExtension; ext != nil {
for _, pkg := range ext.Imports {
g.output.file.Package.AddImport(pkg, "")
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method schemaGenerator.generateRootType
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateRootType() error {
if g.schema.ObjectAsType == nil {
return errSchemaHasNoRoot
}
Function NormalizeBounds
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func NormalizeBounds(
minimum, maximum *float64, exclusiveMinimum, exclusiveMaximum *any,
) (*float64, *float64, bool, bool) {
var minBound, maxBound *float64
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ext := t.GoJSONSchemaExtension; ext != nil {
for _, pkg := range ext.Imports {
g.output.file.Package.AddImport(pkg, "")
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method schemaGenerator.generateStructType
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (g *schemaGenerator) generateStructType(
t *schemas.Type,
scope nameScope,
) (codegen.Type, error) {
if len(t.Properties) == 0 {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if exclusiveMinimum != nil {
switch v := (*exclusiveMinimum).(type) {
case bool:
minExclusive = v
minBound = minimum
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 102.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if exclusiveMaximum != nil {
switch v := (*exclusiveMaximum).(type) {
case bool:
maxExclusive = v
maxBound = maximum
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 102.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76