Class Project
has 124 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Project < ApplicationRecord
include FlagHelper
include FlagValidations
include CanRenderModel
include HasRelationships
Method branch_local_repositories
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def branch_local_repositories(project, pkg_to_enable, opts = {})
# shall we use the repositories from a different project?
project = project.update_instance_or_self('OBS', 'BranchRepositoriesFromProject')
skip_repos = []
a = project.find_attribute('OBS', 'BranchSkipRepositories')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sync_repository_pathes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_repository_pathes
# check all my repositories and ..
repositories.each do |repo|
cycle_detection = {}
repo.path_elements.each do |path|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method revoke_requests
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def revoke_requests
# Find open requests involving self and:
# - revoke them if self is source
# - decline if self is target
# Note: As requests are a backend matter, it's pointless to include them into the transaction below
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remove_repositories
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remove_repositories(repositories, opts = {})
deleted_repository = Repository.deleted_instance
repositories.each do |repo|
linking_repositories = repo.linking_repositories
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method branch_local_repositories
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def branch_local_repositories(project, pkg_to_enable, opts = {})
# shall we use the repositories from a different project?
project = project.update_instance_or_self('OBS', 'BranchRepositoriesFromProject')
skip_repos = []
a = project.find_attribute('OBS', 'BranchSkipRepositories')
Method branch_copy_flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def branch_copy_flags(project)
# Copy the flags from the other project, adjusting them appropriately
# for this one being a branch of it:
#
# - enable building
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write_to_backend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_to_backend
# expire cache
reset_cache
raise ArgumentError, 'no commit_user set' unless @commit_opts[:no_backend_write] || @commit_opts[:login] || @commit_user
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sync_repository_pathes
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Wontfix
def sync_repository_pathes
# check all my repositories and ..
repositories.each do |repo|
cycle_detection = {}
repo.path_elements.each do |path|
Method branch_remote_repositories
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def branch_remote_repositories(project)
remote_project = Project.new(name: project)
remote_project_meta = Nokogiri::XML(remote_project.meta.content, &:strict)
local_project_meta = Nokogiri::XML(render_xml, &:strict)
Method validate_repository_xml_attribute
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_repository_xml_attribute(request_data, project_name)
# Check used repo pathes for existence and read access permissions
request_data.elements('repository') do |repository|
repository.elements('path') do |element|
# permissions check
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method can_be_unlocked?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def can_be_unlocked?(with_exception: true)
if is_maintenance_incident?
requests = BsRequest.where(state: %i[new review declined]).joins(:bs_request_actions)
maintenance_release_requests = requests.where(bs_request_actions: { type: 'maintenance_release', source_project: name })
if maintenance_release_requests.exists?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method cleanup_linking_repos
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cleanup_linking_repos
# replace links to this project repositories with links to the "deleted" repository
find_repos(:linking_repositories) do |linking_repository|
linking_repository.path_elements.includes(:link).find_each do |path_element|
next unless path_element.link.db_project_id == id && path_element.repository.db_project_id != id
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_by_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_by_name(name, include_all_packages: false)
dbp = find_by_name(name, skip_check_access: true)
if dbp.nil?
dbp, remote_name = find_remote_project(name)
return "#{dbp.name}:#{remote_name}" if dbp
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete_on_backend
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_on_backend
if CONFIG['global_write_through'] && !@commit_opts[:no_backend_write]
begin
options = { comment: @commit_opts[:comment] }
options[:user] = @commit_opts[:login] || User.session!.login
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
unless linking_repositories.empty?
str = linking_repositories.map! { |l| "#{l.project.name}/#{l.name}" }.join("\n")
return { error: "Unable to delete repository; following repositories depend on this project:\n#{str}" }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
unless linking_target_repositories.empty?
str = linking_target_repositories.map { |l| "#{l.project.name}/#{l.name}" }.join("\n")
return { error: "Unable to delete repository; following target repositories depend on this project:\n#{str}" }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76