Method initialize
has 232 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
@lexer = REXML::Parsers::XPathParser.new
@tables = {
'attribute' => 'attribs',
Method find
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find(xpath)
# logger.debug "---------------------- parsing xpath: #{xpath} -----------------------"
begin
@stack = @lexer.parse xpath
Method evaluate_expr
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate_expr(expr, root, escape: false)
table = @base_table
a = []
until expr.empty?
token = expr.shift
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_predicate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_predicate(root, stack)
# logger.debug "------------------ predicate ---------------"
# logger.debug "-- pred_array: #{stack.inspect} --"
raise IllegalXpathError, 'invalid predicate' if stack.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_predicate
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_predicate(root, stack)
# logger.debug "------------------ predicate ---------------"
# logger.debug "-- pred_array: #{stack.inspect} --"
raise IllegalXpathError, 'invalid predicate' if stack.nil?
Method evaluate_expr
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def evaluate_expr(expr, root, escape: false)
table = @base_table
a = []
until expr.empty?
token = expr.shift
Method find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 8 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find(xpath)
# logger.debug "---------------------- parsing xpath: #{xpath} -----------------------"
begin
@stack = @lexer.parse xpath
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
raise IllegalXpathError, 'attributes must be $NAMESPACE:$NAME' if tvalues.size != 2
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Confirmed
elsif @last_key && @attribs[table][@last_key][:double]
@condition_values_needed.times { @condition_values << [value, value] }
else
@condition_values_needed.times { @condition_values << value }
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if qtype == :predicate
parse_predicate(root, stack[0])
stack.shift
elsif qtype.nil? || qtype == :qname
# just a plain existence test
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def xpath_op_neq(root, left_value, right_value)
# logger.debug "-- xpath_op_neq(#{left_value.inspect}, #{right_value.inspect}) --"
lval = evaluate_expr(left_value, root)
rval = evaluate_expr(right_value, root)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def xpath_op_eq(root, left_value, right_value)
# logger.debug "-- xpath_op_eq(#{left_value.inspect}, #{right_value.inspect}) --"
lval = evaluate_expr(left_value, root)
rval = evaluate_expr(right_value, root)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76