ota42y/openapi_parser

View on GitHub
lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Method coerce_and_validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def coerce_and_validate(value, schema, **_keyword_args)
      return OpenAPIParser::ValidateError.build_error_result(value, schema) unless value.kind_of?(String)

      value, err = check_enum_include(value, schema)
      return [nil, err] if err
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid too many return statements within this method.
Open

      return [nil, err] if err
Severity: Major
Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 30 mins to fix

    Avoid too many return statements within this method.
    Open

          return [nil, err] if err
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 30 mins to fix

      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
      Open

            return [nil, err] if err
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 30 mins to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

              return [nil, err] if err
        Severity: Major
        Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 30 mins to fix

          Method validate_datetime_format has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def validate_datetime_format(value, schema)
                  return [value, nil] unless schema.format == 'date-time'
          
                  begin
                    if @datetime_coerce_class.nil?
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def validate_max_min_length(value, schema)
                  return [nil, OpenAPIParser::MoreThanMaxLength.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.maxLength && value.size > schema.maxLength
                  return [nil, OpenAPIParser::LessThanMinLength.new(value, schema.object_reference)] if schema.minLength && value.size < schema.minLength
          
                  [value, nil]
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/string_validator.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
          lib/openapi_parser/schema_validator/array_validator.rb on lines 28..32

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 41.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status