Showing 1,207 of 1,207 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 37: if (event.ctrlKey || event.metaKey) {
$.datepicker._adjustDate(event.target, (isRTL ? +1 : -1), "D");
}
handled = event.ctrlKey || event.metaKey;
// -1 day on ctrl or command +left
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 160.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function size
has 156 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.effects.effect.size = function( o, done ) {
// Create element
var original, baseline, factor,
el = $( this ),
Class StoryParser
has 45 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class StoryParser
require 'timeout'
require 'nokogiri'
require 'mechanize'
require 'open-uri'
Class ChallengeAssignment
has 44 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ChallengeAssignment < ApplicationRecord
# We use "-1" to represent all the requested items matching
ALL = -1
belongs_to :collection
Class WorksController
has 44 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WorksController < ApplicationController
# only registered users and NOT admin should be able to create new works
before_action :load_collection
before_action :load_owner, only: [:index]
before_action :users_only, except: [:index, :show, :navigate, :search, :collected, :edit_tags, :update_tags, :drafts, :share]
Function parseDate
has 148 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parseDate: function (format, value, settings) {
if (format == null || value == null) {
throw "Invalid arguments";
}
Function position
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.position = function( options ) {
if ( !options || !options.of ) {
return _position.apply( this, arguments );
}
Class BookmarkQuery
has 43 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class BookmarkQuery < Query
attr_accessor :bookmarkable_query
def klass
'Bookmark'
Method after_update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def after_update
users = []
admins = []
if self.saved_change_to_edited_at? || (self.saved_change_to_unreviewed? && !self.unreviewed?)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_update_multiple_results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_update_multiple_results
TagSet::TAG_TYPES_INITIALIZABLE.each do |tag_type|
@approve[tag_type] = []
@synonym[tag_type] = []
@reject[tag_type] = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
base_options = {
page: params[:page] || 1,
show_restricted: current_user.present? || logged_in_as_admin?
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Series
has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Series < ApplicationRecord
include Bookmarkable
include Searchable
include Creatable
Method setup_for_review
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def setup_for_review
set_limit
@nom_limit = 30
@nominations = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
@nominations_count = HashWithIndifferentAccess.new
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _create
has 135 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_create: function() {
this.element.closest( "form" )
.unbind( "reset" + this.eventNamespace )
.bind( "reset" + this.eventNamespace, formResetHandler );
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pageY = this.containment ? ( (top - this.offset.click.top >= this.containment[1] && top - this.offset.click.top <= this.containment[3]) ? top : ((top - this.offset.click.top >= this.containment[1]) ? top - o.grid[1] : top + o.grid[1])) : top;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pageX = this.containment ? ( (left - this.offset.click.left >= this.containment[0] && left - this.offset.click.left <= this.containment[2]) ? left : ((left - this.offset.click.left >= this.containment[0]) ? left - o.grid[0] : left + o.grid[0])) : left;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 141.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method sort_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sort_link(title, column=nil, options = {})
condition = options[:unless] if options.has_key?(:unless)
unless column.nil?
current_column = (params[:sort_column] == column.to_s) || params[:sort_column].blank? && options[:sort_default]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method wrangle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def wrangle
params[:page] = '1' if params[:page].blank?
params[:sort_column] = 'name' if !valid_sort_column(params[:sort_column], 'tag')
params[:sort_direction] = 'ASC' if !valid_sort_direction(params[:sort_direction])
options = {show: params[:show], page: params[:page], sort_column: params[:sort_column], sort_direction: params[:sort_direction]}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
close_toggles.each(function(){
$j(this).click(function(e){
if ($j(this).attr('href') == '#') {e.preventDefault();}
node.hide();
close_toggles.each(function(){$j(this).hide();});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 140.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
open_toggles.each(function(){
$j(this).click(function(e){
if ($j(this).attr('href') == '#') {e.preventDefault();}
node.show();
open_toggles.each(function(){$j(this).hide();});
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 140.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76