Showing 1,205 of 1,205 total issues
Function Callbacks
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
File comment.rb
has 377 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Comment < ApplicationRecord
include HtmlCleaner
include AfterCommitEverywhere
belongs_to :pseud
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && original.clientX != null ) {
eventDoc = event.target.ownerDocument || document;
doc = eventDoc.documentElement;
body = eventDoc.body;
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
new_collections = []
unapproved_collections = []
errors = []
bookmark_params[:collection_names]&.split(",")&.map(&:strip)&.uniq&.each do |collection_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method show
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
@tag_groups = @work.tag_groups
if params[:view_adult]
cookies[:view_adult] = "true"
elsif @work.adult? && !see_adult?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delayed_generate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.delayed_generate(collection_id)
collection = Collection.find(collection_id)
if collection.challenge.assignments_sent_at.present?
# If assignments have been sent, we don't want to delete everything and
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method show
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
# don't bother collecting tags unless the user gets to see them
if @tag_set.visible || @tag_set.user_is_moderator?(current_user)
# we use this to collect up fandom parents for characters and relationships
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clean_css_code
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_css_code(css_code, options = {})
return "" if !css_code.match(/\w/) # only spaces of various kinds
clean_css = ""
parser = CssParser::Parser.new
parser.add_block!(css_code)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File challenge_assignment.rb
has 360 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ChallengeAssignment < ApplicationRecord
# We use "-1" to represent all the requested items matching
ALL = -1
belongs_to :collection
File application_controller.rb
has 360 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
include Pundit::Authorization
protect_from_forgery with: :exception, prepend: true
rescue_from ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken, with: :display_auth_error
Function support
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var support, all, a, select, opt, input, fragment, eventName, isSupported, i,
div = document.createElement("div");
Method load_site_css
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.load_site_css
Skin.skin_dir_entries(Skin.site_skins_dir, /^\d+\.\d+$/).each do |version|
version_dir = "#{Skin.site_skins_dir + version}/"
if File.directory?(version_dir)
# let's load up the file
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Pseud
has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Pseud < ApplicationRecord
include Searchable
include WorksOwner
include Justifiable
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
error: function(xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
flashContainer.empty();
flashContainer.addClass('error notice');
try {
jQuery.parseJSON(xhr.responseText);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pageY = containment ? ((top - this.offset.click.top >= containment[1] || top - this.offset.click.top > containment[3]) ? top : ((top - this.offset.click.top >= containment[1]) ? top - o.grid[1] : top + o.grid[1])) : top;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
error: function(xhr, textStatus, errorThrown) {
flashContainer.empty();
flashContainer.addClass('error notice');
try {
jQuery.parseJSON(xhr.responseText);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
pageX = containment ? ((left - this.offset.click.left >= containment[0] || left - this.offset.click.left > containment[2]) ? left : ((left - this.offset.click.left >= containment[0]) ? left - o.grid[0] : left + o.grid[0])) : left;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method notify_parent_comment_owner
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def notify_parent_comment_owner
if self.reply_comment? && !self.unreviewed?
parent_comment = self.commentable
parent_comment_owner = parent_comment.comment_owner # will be nil if not a user, including if an admin
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
if params[:user_id] && (@user = User.find_by(login: params[:user_id]))
if current_user == @user
@challenge_signups = @user.challenge_signups.order_by_date
render action: :index and return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File rails.js
has 346 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
(function($, undefined) {
/**
* Unobtrusive scripting adapter for jQuery
* https://github.com/rails/jquery-ujs