pac4j-config/src/main/java/org/pac4j/config/client/PropertiesConfigFactory.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method hasOAuthClients has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    protected boolean hasOAuthClients() {
        if (isNotBlank(getProperty(LINKEDIN_ID)) && isNotBlank(getProperty(LINKEDIN_SECRET))) {
            return true;
        }
        if (isNotBlank(getProperty(FACEBOOK_ID)) && isNotBlank(getProperty(FACEBOOK_SECRET))) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method build has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public Config build(final Object... parameters) {

        final List<Client> clients = new ArrayList<>();
        final Map<String, Authenticator> authenticators = new HashMap<>();

    Method hasHttpAuthenticatorsOrClients has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        protected boolean hasHttpAuthenticatorsOrClients() {
            if (isNotBlank(getProperty(ANONYMOUS))) {
                return true;
            }
            for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_AUTHENTICATORS; i++) {

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method hasOAuthClients has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        protected boolean hasOAuthClients() {
            if (isNotBlank(getProperty(LINKEDIN_ID)) && isNotBlank(getProperty(LINKEDIN_SECRET))) {
                return true;
            }
            if (isNotBlank(getProperty(FACEBOOK_ID)) && isNotBlank(getProperty(FACEBOOK_SECRET))) {

      Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Override
          public Config build(final Object... parameters) {
      
              final List<Client> clients = new ArrayList<>();
              final Map<String, Authenticator> authenticators = new HashMap<>();

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
      Open

                  return true;

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

                    return true;

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                      return true;

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                        return true;

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                      return false;

                Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                Open

                                return true;

                  Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                  Open

                          return false;

                    Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                    Open

                                return true;

                      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                      Open

                                  return true;

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            protected boolean hasSpringEncoder() {
                                for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_ENCODERS; i++) {
                                    val type = getProperty(SPRING_ENCODER_TYPE, i);
                                    if (isNotBlank(type)) {
                                        return true;
                        pac4j-config/src/main/java/org/pac4j/config/client/PropertiesConfigFactory.java on lines 156..164

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 51.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            protected boolean hasLdapAuthenticator() {
                                for (var i = 0; i <= MAX_NUM_AUTHENTICATORS; i++) {
                                    val type = getProperty(LDAP_TYPE, i);
                                    if (isNotBlank(type)) {
                                        return true;
                        pac4j-config/src/main/java/org/pac4j/config/client/PropertiesConfigFactory.java on lines 141..149

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 51.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        There are no issues that match your filters.

                        Category
                        Status