rapid7/ruby_smb

View on GitHub

Showing 307 of 307 total issues

File ndr.rb has 1018 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module RubySMB::Dcerpc::Ndr

  require 'ruby_smb/field'

  # NDR Syntax
Severity: Major
Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/ndr.rb - About 2 days to fix

    File samr.rb has 749 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module RubySMB
      module Dcerpc
        module Samr
    
          UUID = '12345778-1234-abcd-ef00-0123456789ac'
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/samr.rb - About 1 day to fix

      File drsr.rb has 673 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      module RubySMB
        module Dcerpc
          module Drsr
      
            UUID = 'E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2'
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/drsr.rb - About 1 day to fix

        File lsarpc.rb has 487 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        require 'ruby_smb/dcerpc/ndr'
        require 'ruby_smb/dcerpc/rrp_rpc_unicode_string'
        require 'ruby_smb/dcerpc/samr/rpc_sid'
        require 'ruby_smb/dcerpc/uuid'
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/lsarpc.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

          Method handle_smb has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def handle_smb(raw_request)
                  response = nil
          
                  case raw_request[0...4].unpack1('L>')
                  when RubySMB::SMB1::SMB_PROTOCOL_ID
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/server_client.rb - About 6 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method send_recv has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def send_recv(packet, encrypt: false)
                version = packet.packet_smb_version
                case version
                when 'SMB1'
                  packet.smb_header.uid = self.user_id if self.user_id
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/ruby_smb/client.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          File server_client.rb has 362 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          module RubySMB
            class Server
              # This class represents a single connected client to the server. It stores and processes connection specific related
              # information.
              class ServerClient
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/server_client.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

            File winreg.rb has 359 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            module RubySMB
              module Dcerpc
                module Winreg
            
                  UUID = '338CD001-2244-31F1-AAAA-900038001003'
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/winreg.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

              File client.rb has 355 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              module RubySMB
                # Represents an SMB client capable of talking to SMB1 or SMB2 servers and handling
                # all end-user client functionality.
                class Client
                  require 'ruby_smb/ntlm'
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/ruby_smb/client.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

                Method parse_negotiate_response has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                      def parse_negotiate_response(packet)
                        case packet
                        when RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::NegotiateResponseExtended
                          self.smb1 = true
                          self.smb2 = false
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/ruby_smb/client/negotiation.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Class VirtualStat has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                          class VirtualStat
                
                            # All of the keyword arguments are the keys of the attributes to set. The names are left as is, maintaining
                            # a direct 1 to 1 relationship. See the Ruby docs for File::Stat
                            # (https://ruby-doc.org/core-3.0.2/File/Stat.html) for a list of all the attributes that can be set. Some
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_stat.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

                  Method do_create_smb2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                                def do_create_smb2(request)
                                  unless request.create_disposition == RubySMB::Dispositions::FILE_OPEN
                                    logger.warn("Can not handle CREATE request for disposition: #{request.create_disposition}")
                                    raise NotImplementedError
                                  end
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/disk/processor/create.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                    module SMB2
                      module BitField
                        # An Access Mask bit field used to describe the permissions on a File, Printer, or named Pipe. As defined in
                        # [2.2.13.1.1 File_Pipe_Printer_Access_Mask](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246802.aspx)
                        class FileAccessMask < BinData::Record
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 119.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                    module SMB1
                      module BitField
                        # An Access Mask bit field used to describe the permissions on a Directory, as defined in
                        # [2.2.1.4.2 Directory_Access_Mask](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff470234.aspx)
                        class DirectoryAccessMask < BinData::Record
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 119.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                    module SMB1
                      module BitField
                        # An Access Mask bit field used to describe the permissions on a File, Printer, or named Pipe. As defined in
                        # [2.2.1.4.1 File_Pipe_Printer_Access_Mask](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff469915.aspx)
                        class FileAccessMask < BinData::Record
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 119.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                    module SMB2
                      module BitField
                        # An Access Mask bit field used to describe the permissions on a Directory, as defined in
                        # [2.2.13.1.2 Directory_Access_Mask](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246801.aspx)
                        class DirectoryAccessMask < BinData::Record
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/directory_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35
                  lib/ruby_smb/smb2/bit_field/file_access_mask.rb on lines 2..35

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 119.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  optparser = OptionParser.new do |opts|
                    opts.banner = "Usage: #{File.basename(__FILE__)} [options] target share"
                    opts.on("--[no-]smbv1", "Enable or disable SMBv1 (default: #{options[:smbv1] ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'})") do |smbv1|
                      options[:smbv1] = smbv1
                    end
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in examples/tree_connect.rb and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  examples/pwsh_service.rb on lines 29..48
                  examples/read_file.rb on lines 27..46

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 115.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  optparser = OptionParser.new do |opts|
                    opts.banner = "Usage: #{File.basename(__FILE__)} [options] target share file"
                    opts.on("--[no-]smbv1", "Enable or disable SMBv1 (default: #{options[:smbv1] ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'})") do |smbv1|
                      options[:smbv1] = smbv1
                    end
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in examples/read_file.rb and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  examples/pwsh_service.rb on lines 29..48
                  examples/tree_connect.rb on lines 25..44

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 115.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  optparser = OptionParser.new do |opts|
                    opts.banner = "Usage: #{File.basename(__FILE__)} [options] target command"
                    opts.on("--[no-]smbv1", "Enable or disable SMBv1 (default: #{options[:smbv1] ? 'Enabled' : 'Disabled'})") do |smbv1|
                      options[:smbv1] = smbv1
                    end
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in examples/pwsh_service.rb and 2 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  examples/read_file.rb on lines 27..46
                  examples/tree_connect.rb on lines 25..44

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 115.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  File query.rb has 297 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  require 'ruby_smb/server/share/provider/processor'
                  
                  module RubySMB
                    class Server
                      module Share
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/disk/processor/query.rb - About 3 hrs to fix
                    Severity
                    Category
                    Status
                    Source
                    Language