Showing 310 of 310 total issues
Method transaction2_smb1_find_first2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transaction2_smb1_find_first2(request)
# see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-cifs/f93455dc-2bd7-4698-b91e-8c9c7abd63cf
raise ArgumentError unless request.data_block.trans2_parameters.is_a? SMB1::Packet::Trans2::FindFirst2RequestTrans2Parameters
subdir, _, search_pattern = request.data_block.trans2_parameters.filename.encode.gsub('\\', File::SEPARATOR).rpartition(File::SEPARATOR)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dcerpc_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dcerpc_request(stub_packet, options={})
options.merge!(endpoint: stub_packet.class.name.split('::').at(-2))
dcerpc_request = RubySMB::Dcerpc::Request.new({ opnum: stub_packet.opnum }, options)
dcerpc_request.stub.read(stub_packet.to_binary_s)
if options[:auth_level] &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_create_smb2
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_create_smb2(request)
unless request.create_disposition == RubySMB::Dispositions::FILE_OPEN
logger.warn("Can not handle CREATE request for disposition: #{request.create_disposition}")
raise NotImplementedError
end
Method ioctl_send_recv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ioctl_send_recv(action, options={})
request = set_header_fields(RubySMB::SMB2::Packet::IoctlRequest.new(options))
request.ctl_code = 0x0011C017
request.flags.is_fsctl = 0x00000001
# TODO: handle fragmentation when the request size > MAX_XMIT_FRAG
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File svcctl.rb
has 287 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module RubySMB
module Dcerpc
module Svcctl
UUID = '367abb81-9844-35f1-ad32-98f038001003'
Method build_fscc_file_information
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_fscc_file_information(path, info_class, rename: nil)
case info_class
when Fscc::FileInformation::FILE_ACCESS_INFORMATION
info = Fscc::FileInformation::FileAccessInformation.new
# smb2_access_mask returns back either file or directory access mask depending on what path is,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module SMB1
module Packet
module Trans2
# The Trans2 Parameter Block for this particular Subcommand
class QueryPathInformationResponseTrans2Parameters < BinData::Record
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module SMB1
module Packet
module Trans2
# The Trans2 Parameter Block for this particular Subcommand
class QueryFileInformationResponseTrans2Parameters < BinData::Record
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(tree:, response:, name:)
raise ArgumentError, 'No Name Provided' if name.nil?
case name
when 'netlogon', '\\netlogon'
extend RubySMB::Dcerpc::Netlogon
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(tree:, response:, name:)
raise ArgumentError, 'No Name Provided' if name.nil?
case name
when 'netlogon', '\\netlogon'
extend RubySMB::Dcerpc::Netlogon
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 101.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method recv_packet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recv_packet(full_response: false)
raise RubySMB::Error::CommunicationError, 'Connection has already been closed' if @tcp_socket.closed?
if IO.select([@tcp_socket], nil, nil, @read_timeout).nil?
raise RubySMB::Error::CommunicationError, "Read timeout expired when reading from the Socket (timeout=#{@read_timeout})"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _handle_smb2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _handle_smb2(raw_request)
begin
header = RubySMB::SMB2::SMB2Header.read(raw_request)
rescue IOError => e
logger.error("Caught a #{e.class} while reading the SMB2 header (#{e.message})")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_negotiate_smb2
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_negotiate_smb2(request)
client_dialects = request.dialects.map { |d| "0x%04x" % d }
server_dialects = @server.dialects.select { |dialect| Dialect[dialect].order == Dialect::ORDER_SMB2 }
dialect = (server_dialects & client_dialects).first
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class FindFirst2Response < RubySMB::GenericPacket
COMMAND = RubySMB::SMB1::Commands::SMB_COM_TRANSACTION2
class ParameterBlock < RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::Trans2::Response::ParameterBlock
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class FindNext2Response < RubySMB::GenericPacket
COMMAND = RubySMB::SMB1::Commands::SMB_COM_TRANSACTION2
class ParameterBlock < RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::Trans2::Response::ParameterBlock
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module BitField
# The bit-field for SMB1 Extended File Attributes as defined in
# [2.2.1.2.3 SMB_EXT_FILE_ATTR](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee878573.aspx) and
# [2.2.1.2.1 Extended File Attribute (SMB_EXT_FILE_ATTR) Extensions](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc246322.aspx)
class SmbExtFileAttributes < BinData::Record
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Fscc
# The bit-field for File System Control Code File Attributes as defined in
# [2.6 File Attributes](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc232110.aspx)
class FileAttributes < BinData::Record
endian :little
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method handle_smb2
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_smb2(raw_request, header)
session_required = !(header.command == SMB2::Commands::SESSION_SETUP && header.session_id == 0)
if header.flags.related_operations == 0
@smb2_related_operations_state.clear
Method _open
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _open(filename:, flags: nil, options: nil, disposition: RubySMB::Dispositions::FILE_OPEN,
impersonation: RubySMB::ImpersonationLevels::SEC_IMPERSONATE, read: true, write: false, delete: false)
nt_create_andx_request = RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::NtCreateAndxRequest.new
nt_create_andx_request = set_header_fields(nt_create_andx_request)
Method do_query_directory_smb2
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_query_directory_smb2(request)
local_path = get_local_path(request.file_id)
if local_path.nil?
response = RubySMB::SMB2::Packet::ErrorPacket.new
response.smb2_header.nt_status = WindowsError::NTStatus::STATUS_FILE_CLOSED
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"