Sign upLogin

rapid7/ruby_smb

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 310 of 310 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        class FindNext2ResponseDataBlock < RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::Trans2::DataBlock
          string                                 :pad1,               length: -> { pad1_length }
          find_next2_response_trans2_parameters  :trans2_parameters,  label: 'Trans2 Parameters'
          string                                 :pad2,               length: -> { pad2_length }
          find_next2_response_trans2_data        :trans2_data,        label: 'Trans2 Data', length: 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_next2_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/nt_trans/create_response.rb on lines 41..46
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_first2_response.rb on lines 34..39

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            def readable?
              return true if owned? && (mode & 1 << 8 != 0)
              return true if grpowned? && (mode & 1 << 5 != 0)
              return true if world_readable?
              return false
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_stat.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_stat.rb on lines 151..155

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            def writable?
              return true if owned? && (mode & 1 << 7 != 0)
              return true if grpowned? && (mode & 1 << 4 != 0)
              return true if world_writable?
              return false
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_stat.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_stat.rb on lines 140..144

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          class DataBlock < RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::Trans2::DataBlock
            string            :pad1,               length: -> { pad1_length }
            trans2_parameters :trans2_parameters,  label: 'Trans2 Parameters'
            string            :pad2,               length: -> { pad2_length }
            string            :trans2_data,        label: 'Trans2 Data', length: 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/nt_trans/create_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_first2_response.rb on lines 34..39
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_next2_response.rb on lines 33..38

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module SMB1
    module BitField
      # The OpenMode bit-field for an SMB1 Open2 Request as defined in
      # [2.2.6.1.1 Request](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441733.aspx)
      class Open2OpenMode < BinData::Record
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/open2_open_mode.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/bit_field/file_status_flags.rb on lines 2..15

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        class FindFirst2ResponseDataBlock < RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::Trans2::DataBlock
          string                                  :pad1,               length: -> { pad1_length }
          find_first2_response_trans2_parameters  :trans2_parameters,  label: 'Trans2 Parameters'
          string                                  :pad2,               length: -> { pad2_length }
          find_first2_response_trans2_data        :trans2_data,        label: 'Trans2 Data', length: 0
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_first2_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/nt_trans/create_response.rb on lines 41..46
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans2/find_next2_response.rb on lines 33..38

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 32.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            choice :name, :selection      => lambda { parent.smb_header.flags2.unicode.to_i },
                          :copy_on_change => true do
              stringz   0, label: 'Name', initial_value: "\\PIPE\\"
              stringz16 1, label: 'Name', initial_value: "\\PIPE\\".encode('utf-16le')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans/request.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans/transact_nmpipe_request.rb on lines 28..32

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def smb1_session_setup_response(raw_response)
        packet = RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::SessionSetupResponse.read(raw_response)

        unless packet.valid?
          raise RubySMB::Error::InvalidPacket.new(
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 60..70
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 262..272

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module SMB1
    module Packet
      # A SMB1 SMB_COM_CLOSE Response Packet as defined in
      # [2.2.4.5.2 Response](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441667.aspx)
      class CloseResponse < RubySMB::GenericPacket
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/close_response.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/tree_disconnect_response.rb on lines 2..24

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            choice :name, :selection      => lambda { parent.smb_header.flags2.unicode.to_i },
                          :copy_on_change => true do
              stringz   0, label: 'Name', initial_value: "\\PIPE\\"
              stringz16 1, label: 'Name', initial_value: "\\PIPE\\".encode('utf-16le')
            end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans/transact_nmpipe_request.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/trans/request.rb on lines 37..42

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def smb1_anonymous_auth_response(raw_response)
        packet = RubySMB::SMB1::Packet::SessionSetupLegacyResponse.read(raw_response)

        unless packet.valid?
          raise RubySMB::Error::InvalidPacket.new(
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 153..163
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 262..272

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            bit4      :reserved,             label: 'Reserved Space'
            bit1      :msg_start,            label: 'Message Start'
            bit1      :raw_mode,             label: 'Raw Mode'
            bit1      :read_bytes_available, label: 'Read Bytes Available'
            bit1      :writethrough_mode,    label: 'Writethrough Mode'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/write_andx_request.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb2/packet/query_directory_request.rb on lines 15..21

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  module SMB1
    module Packet
      # This class represents an SMB1 TreeDisonnect Response Packet as defined in
      # [2.2.4.51.2 Response](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441823.aspx)
      class TreeDisconnectResponse < RubySMB::GenericPacket
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/tree_disconnect_response.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/close_response.rb on lines 2..23

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

          bit3  :reserved2,       label: 'Reserved Space'
          bit1  :reopen,          label: 'Reopen Search'
          bit1  :reserved,        label: 'Reserved Space'
          bit1  :index_specified, label: 'Start at Specified Index'
          bit1  :return_single,   label: 'Return Single Entry'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/smb2/packet/query_directory_request.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/smb1/packet/write_andx_request.rb on lines 20..27

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def smb2_session_setup_response(raw_response)
        packet = RubySMB::SMB2::Packet::SessionSetupResponse.read(raw_response)
        unless packet.valid?
          raise RubySMB::Error::InvalidPacket.new(
            expected_proto: RubySMB::SMB2::SMB2_PROTOCOL_ID,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 60..70
lib/ruby_smb/client/authentication.rb on lines 153..163

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method smb3_decrypt has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def smb3_decrypt(th)
        unless @server_encryption_key
          raise RubySMB::Error::EncryptionError.new('The encryption algorithm has not been set') if @encryption_algorithm.nil?

          key_bit_len = OpenSSL::Cipher.new(@encryption_algorithm).key_len * 8
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/client/encryption.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_static_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def add_static_file(path, content, stat: nil)
            path = VirtualPathname.cleanpath(path)
            path = File::SEPARATOR + path unless path.start_with?(File::SEPARATOR)
            raise ArgumentError.new('must be a file') if stat && !stat.file?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method process has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

          def process(request_buffer=nil)
            if request_buffer.nil?
              # this is only NTLMSSP (as opposed to SPNEGO + NTLMSSP)
              buffer = OpenSSL::ASN1::ASN1Data.new([
                Gss::OID_SPNEGO,
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/gss/provider/ntlm.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method children has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def children(with_directory=true)
              raise Errno::ENOTDIR.new("Not a directory @ dir_initialize - #{to_s}") unless directory?

              @virtual_disk.each_value.select { |dent| dent.dirname == self && dent != self }.map { |dent| with_directory ? dent : dent.basename }
            end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/server/share/provider/virtual_disk/virtual_pathname.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method query_service_config has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def query_service_config(svc_handle)
        qsc_request = QueryServiceConfigWRequest.new
        qsc_request.h_service = svc_handle
        qsc_request.cb_buf_size = 0
        response = dcerpc_request(qsc_request)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ruby_smb/dcerpc/svcctl.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language