Showing 310 of 310 total issues
Method drs_bind
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def drs_bind
drs_extensions_int = DrsExtensionsInt.new(
dw_flags: DRS_EXT_GETCHGREQ_V6 | DRS_EXT_GETCHGREPLY_V6 | DRS_EXT_GETCHGREQ_V8 | DRS_EXT_STRONG_ENCRYPTION,
dw_ext_caps: 0xFFFFFFFF
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recv_struct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recv_struct(struct)
raise Error::CommunicationError, 'Connection has already been closed' if @tcp_socket.closed?
if IO.select([@tcp_socket], nil, nil, @read_timeout).nil?
raise Error::CommunicationError, "Read timeout expired when reading from the Socket (timeout=#{@read_timeout})"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method samr_enumerate_users_in_domain
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def samr_enumerate_users_in_domain(domain_handle:,
enumeration_context: 0,
user_account_control: USER_NORMAL_ACCOUNT |
USER_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT |
USER_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT |
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method samr_enumerate_domains_in_sam_server
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def samr_enumerate_domains_in_sam_server(server_handle:, enumeration_context: 0)
samr_enum_domains_request = SamrEnumerateDomainsInSamServerRequest.new(
server_handle: server_handle,
enumeration_context: enumeration_context,
prefered_maximum_length: 0xFFFFFFFF
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(data:'', offset: 0)
max_write = tree.client.server_max_write_size
max_write = 65536 unless tree.client.server_supports_multi_credit
buffer = data.dup
bytes = data.length
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def name
sid = case sub_authority.size
when 1
WELL_KNOWN_SID_NAME[[identifier_authority[-1].to_i, sub_authority[0].to_i]]
when 2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_ntlm_type1
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_ntlm_type1(type1_msg)
type2_msg = Net::NTLM::Message::Type2.new.tap do |msg|
msg.target_name = 'LOCALHOST'.encode('UTF-16LE').b
msg.flag = 0
%i{ KEY56 KEY128 KEY_EXCHANGE UNICODE TARGET_INFO VERSION_INFO }.each do |flag|
Method do_transactions2_smb1
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_transactions2_smb1(request)
# can't find an example where more than one setup is set, this code makes alot of assumptions that there
# are exactly 0 or 1 entries
if request.parameter_block.setup.length > 1
raise NotImplementedError, 'There are more than 1 TRANSACTION2 setup values'
Method do_nt_create_andx_smb1
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_nt_create_andx_smb1(request)
path = request.data_block.file_name.snapshot
path = path.encode.gsub(/\/|\\/, File::SEPARATOR)
path = path.delete_prefix(File::SEPARATOR)
local_path = get_local_path(path)
Method do_num_bytes
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_num_bytes(struct_offset = 0, is_deferred: false)
sum = 0
if is_deferred
if is_a?(NdrStruct) && self.class.superclass.has_conformant_array
# align :max_count since it will be placed in front of the structure.
Method samr_enumerate_domains_in_sam_server
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def samr_enumerate_domains_in_sam_server(server_handle:, enumeration_context: 0)
samr_enum_domains_request = SamrEnumerateDomainsInSamServerRequest.new(
server_handle: server_handle,
enumeration_context: enumeration_context,
prefered_maximum_length: 0xFFFFFFFF
Method samr_enumerate_users_in_domain
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def samr_enumerate_users_in_domain(domain_handle:,
enumeration_context: 0,
user_account_control: USER_NORMAL_ACCOUNT |
USER_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT |
USER_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT |
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
loop do
break if dcerpc_response.pdu_header.pfc_flags.last_frag == 1
raw_data = read(bytes: @tree.client.max_buffer_size)
dcerpc_response = dcerpc_response_from_raw_response(raw_data)
if options[:auth_level] &&
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
loop do
break if dcerpc_response.pdu_header.pfc_flags.last_frag == 1
raw_data = read(bytes: @tree.client.max_buffer_size)
dcerpc_response = dcerpc_response_from_raw_response(raw_data)
if options[:auth_level] &&
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method drs_domain_controller_info
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def drs_domain_controller_info(h_drs, domain)
drs_domain_controller_info_request = DrsDomainControllerInfoRequest.new(
h_drs: h_drs,
pmsg_in: {
switch_type: 1,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class CreateContextRequest < CreateContext
delayed_io :data, read_abs_offset: -> { abs_offset + data_offset } do
choice :data, selection: -> { name.snapshot } do
create_durable_handle_request CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE, length: :data_length
create_durable_handle_v2_request CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_V2, length: :data_length
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def close_service_handle(svc_handle)
csh_request = CloseServiceHandleRequest.new(h_sc_object: svc_handle)
response = dcerpc_request(csh_request)
begin
csh_response = CloseServiceHandleResponse.read(response)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class CreateContextResponse < CreateContext
delayed_io :data, read_abs_offset: -> { abs_offset + data_offset } do
choice :data, selection: -> { name.snapshot } do
create_durable_handle_response CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE, length: :data_length
create_durable_handle_v2_response CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_V2, length: :data_length
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_service(svc_handle)
ds_request = DeleteServiceRequest.new(lp_sc_handle: svc_handle)
response = dcerpc_request(ds_request)
begin
ds_response = DeleteServiceResponse.read(response)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method process_gss_type3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_gss_type3(gss_api)
neg_token_init = Hash[RubySMB::Gss.asn1dig(gss_api, 0).value.map { |obj| [obj.tag, obj.value[0].value] }]
raw_type3_msg = neg_token_init[2]
type3_msg = Net::NTLM::Message.parse(raw_type3_msg)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"