File ndr.rb
has 1018 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module RubySMB::Dcerpc::Ndr
require 'ruby_smb/field'
# NDR Syntax
Method do_num_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_num_bytes(struct_offset = 0, is_deferred: false)
sum = 0
if is_deferred
if is_a?(NdrStruct) && self.class.superclass.has_conformant_array
# align :max_count since it will be placed in front of the structure.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extend_top_level_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extend_top_level_class
current = self
loop do
current.extend(TopLevelPlugin) unless current.is_a?(TopLevelPlugin)
if current.parent.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fetch_alias_referent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch_alias_referent(current: parent, ref: get_parameter(:ref_to), name: nil)
return if current.nil?
if current.get_parameter(:ref_to) == ref
raise ArgumentError.new(
"Pointer alias refering to #{ref} cannot be found. This referent "\
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_write(io, is_deferred: false)
if is_deferred
if is_a?(NdrStruct) && self.class.superclass.has_conformant_array
# align :max_count since it will be placed in front of the structure.
# The structure itself will be properly aligned later.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_read(io, is_deferred: false)
if is_deferred
if is_a?(NdrStruct) && self.class.superclass.has_conformant_array
# align :max_count since it will be placed in front of the structure.
# The structure itself will be properly aligned later.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write_ref_id
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_ref_id(io)
if is_alias?
ref_field = fetch_alias_referent
if ref_field
if ref_field.class != self.class
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_num_bytes
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_num_bytes(struct_offset = 0, is_deferred: false)
sum = 0
if is_deferred
if is_a?(NdrStruct) && self.class.superclass.has_conformant_array
# align :max_count since it will be placed in front of the structure.
Method sanitize_parameters!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sanitize_parameters!(obj_class, params)
res = super
type_class = params[:type]
# Let the BinData::Array sanitization routine deal with "no type provided"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method assign
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def assign(val)
if val == :null
@ref_id = 0
elsif is_alias?
ref_field = fetch_alias_referent
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_num_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_num_bytes
sum = 0
if should_process_max_count?
# count max_count (4 bytes)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bytes_to_align
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bytes_to_align(obj, rel_offset)
if obj.is_a?(PointerPlugin)
# Pointers are always 4-bytes aligned
return (4 - (rel_offset % 4)) % 4
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_write(io)
if should_process_max_count?
max_count = retrieve_max_count
io.writebytes([max_count].pack('L<')) if max_count
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_num_bytes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_num_bytes(struct_offset = 0)
sum = 0
if is_a?(ConfPlugin) && should_process_max_count?
sum += 4
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_write(io)
if is_a?(ConfPlugin) && should_process_max_count?
io.writebytes([@max_count].pack('L<'))
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method method_missing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.method_missing(symbol, *args, &block)
field = super
if field.is_a?(::Array) && field.last.is_a?(BinData::SanitizedField)
unless field.last.has_parameter?(:byte_align) || field.last.instantiate.bit_aligned?
raise ArgumentError.new(
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sum_num_bytes_below_index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sum_num_bytes_below_index(index)
(0...index).inject(0) do |sum, i|
nbytes = 0
if elements[i].has_parameter?(:byte_align) && elements[i].respond_to?(:bytes_to_align)
nbytes = elements[i].bytes_to_align(elements[i], sum.ceil)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
unless self.const_defined?(new_klass_name)
new_klass = Class.new(NdrConfArray) do
default_parameters type: "ndr_#{klass}".downcase.to_sym
extend PointerClassPlugin
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
unless self.const_defined?(new_klass_name)
new_klass = Class.new(NdrConfVarArray) do
default_parameters type: "ndr_#{klass}".downcase.to_sym
extend PointerClassPlugin
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76