ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby

View on GitHub

Showing 498 of 498 total issues

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    else if ((fh = f.hash) == MOVED) {
                        if ((fk = f.key) instanceof TreeBin) {
                            TreeBin t = (TreeBin)fk;
                            boolean validated = false;
                            t.acquire(0);
ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/nounsafe/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 1954..2022

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 514.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

ConcurrentHashMapV8 has 58 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

public class ConcurrentHashMapV8<K, V>
        implements ConcurrentMap<K, V>, Serializable, ConcurrentHashMap<K, V> {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = 7249069246763182397L;

    /**

    Method readObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
                throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            s.defaultReadObject();
            this.segments = null; // unneeded
            // initialize transient final field

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method readObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream s)
                throws java.io.IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
            s.defaultReadObject();
            this.segments = null; // unneeded
            // initialize transient final field

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            while (tab != null && i < tab.length) {
                int fh; Object fk;
                Node f = tabAt(tab, i);
                if (f == null)
                    ++i;
    ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/nounsafe/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 2318..2370

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 398.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            while (tab != null && i < tab.length()) {
                int fh; Object fk;
                Node f = tabAt(tab, i);
                if (f == null)
                    ++i;
    ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 2326..2378

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 398.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method deleteTreeNode has 159 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            final void deleteTreeNode(TreeNode p) {
                TreeNode next = (TreeNode)p.next; // unlink traversal pointers
                TreeNode pred = p.prev;
                if (pred == null)
                    first = next;

      Method deleteTreeNode has 159 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              final void deleteTreeNode(TreeNode p) {
                  TreeNode next = (TreeNode)p.next; // unlink traversal pointers
                  TreeNode pred = p.prev;
                  if (pred == null)
                      first = next;

        Method internalClear has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private final void internalClear() {
                long delta = 0L; // negative number of deletions
                int i = 0;
                AtomicReferenceArray<Node> tab = table;
                while (tab != null && i < tab.length()) {

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method internalClear has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private final void internalClear() {
                long delta = 0L; // negative number of deletions
                int i = 0;
                Node[] tab = table;
                while (tab != null && i < tab.length) {

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        input_paths.each_with_index do |input_path, i|
        
          pid = fork do
            require_relative 'init'
        
        
        Severity: Major
        Found in docs-source/actor/format.rb and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
        examples/format.rb on lines 12..74

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 198.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        input_paths.each_with_index do |input_path, i|
        
          pid = fork do
            require_relative 'init'
        
        
        Severity: Major
        Found in examples/format.rb and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
        docs-source/actor/format.rb on lines 13..75

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 198.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public static final class EntrySetView<K,V> extends CHMView<K,V>
                    implements Set<Map.Entry<K,V>> {
                EntrySetView(ConcurrentHashMapV8<K, V> map) { super(map); }
                public final boolean contains(Object o) {
                    Object k, v, r; Map.Entry<?,?> e;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 3753..3807

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 357.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public static final class EntrySetView<K,V> extends CHMView<K,V>
                    implements Set<Map.Entry<K,V>> {
                EntrySetView(ConcurrentHashMapV8<K, V> map) { super(map); }
                public final boolean contains(Object o) {
                    Object k, v, r; Map.Entry<?,?> e;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/nounsafe/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 3745..3799

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 357.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                        try {
                            if (tabAt(tab, i) == f) {
                                count = 1;
                                for (Node e = f, pred = null;; ++count) {
                                    Object ek, ev;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 1776..1814

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 342.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                        try {
                            if (tabAt(tab, i) == f) {
                                count = 1;
                                for (Node e = f, pred = null;; ++count) {
                                    Object ek, ev;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/nounsafe/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 1768..1806

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 342.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                        try {
                            if (tabAt(tab, i) == f) {
                                count = 1;
                                for (Node e = f, pred = null;; ++count) {
                                    Object ek, ev;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/nounsafe/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 1877..1914

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 322.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                        try {
                            if (tabAt(tab, i) == f) {
                                count = 1;
                                for (Node e = f, pred = null;; ++count) {
                                    Object ek, ev;
        ext/concurrent-ruby/com/concurrent_ruby/ext/jsr166e/ConcurrentHashMapV8.java on lines 1885..1922

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 322.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method advance has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                final V advance() {
                    Node e = next;
                    V ev = null;
                    outer: do {
                        if (e != null)                  // advance past used/skipped node

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method advance has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                final V advance() {
                    Node e = next;
                    V ev = null;
                    outer: do {
                        if (e != null)                  // advance past used/skipped node

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language