Showing 41 of 41 total issues
VersionComparisonTests
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class VersionComparisonTests: XCTestCase {
// MARK: - Major Numbers
func testMajorComparatorEqualityWhereMajorNumbersEqual() {
Function manufacture
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func manufacture() -> UpdatesResult {
guard let bundleVersion = configuration.bundleVersion else {
return .none(
AppUpdatedResult(isFirstLaunchFollowingInstall: false, isFirstLaunchFollowingUpdate: false)
)
Function compareVersions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static func compareVersions(
lhs: String,
lhsBuildNumber: String? = nil,
rhs: String,
rhsBuildNumber: String? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compareVersions
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static func compareVersions(
lhs: String,
lhsBuildNumber: String? = nil,
rhs: String,
rhsBuildNumber: String? = nil,
Function promptToUpdate
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static func promptToUpdate(
_ result: UpdatesResult,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
presentingViewController: UIViewController,
Function promptToUpdate
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static func promptToUpdate(
newVersionString: String?,
appStoreId: String?,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
Function registerBuild
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func registerBuild(versionString: String, buildString: String?, comparator: VersionComparator) ->
AppUpdatedResult {
let buildString = buildString ?? "0"
guard var versionInformation = cachedVersionInfo() else {
postAppDidInstallNotification()
Function checkForUpdates
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func checkForUpdates(completion: @escaping (UpdatesResult) -> Void) {
DispatchQueue.global(qos: .background).async {
self.appMetadataService.fetchAppMetadata { result in
switch result {
case .success(let apiResult):
Function manufacture
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func manufacture() -> UpdatesResult {
guard let bundleVersion = configuration.bundleVersion else {
return .none(
AppUpdatedResult(isFirstLaunchFollowingInstall: false, isFirstLaunchFollowingUpdate: false)
)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkForUpdates
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func checkForUpdates(completion: @escaping (UpdatesResult) -> Void) {
let updatesService: UpdateResolutionService
switch strategy {
case .automatically:
if let appMetadataService = appMetadataService {
Function minVersionRequirement
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private func minVersionRequirement(
minAppVersion: String,
bundleVersion: String,
configuration: ConfigurationResult,
updateType: UpdateType
Function promptToUpdate
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
newVersionString: String?,
appStoreId: String?,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
presentingViewController: UIViewController,
Function encode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
try container.encode(appStoreId, forKey: .appStoreId)
try container.encode(buildString, forKey: .build)
try container.encode(bundleVersion, forKey: .bundleVersion)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function promptToUpdate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static func promptToUpdate(
_ result: UpdatesResult,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
presentingViewController: UIViewController,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function promptToUpdate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static func promptToUpdate(
newVersionString: String?,
appStoreId: String?,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
guard let json = try? JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: .allowFragments),
let jsonContainer = json as? [String: Any],
let results = jsonContainer["results"],
let resultsData = try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: results) else {
if let result = (try? decoder.decode([ITunesSearchAPIResult].self, from: data))?.first {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
guard let json = try? JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data, options: .allowFragments),
let jsonContainer = json as? [String: Any],
let results = jsonContainer["updates"],
let resultsData = try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: results) else {
if let result = try? decoder.decode(ConfigurationResult.self, from: data) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function promptToUpdate
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_ result: UpdatesResult,
animated: Bool = true,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
presentingViewController: UIViewController,
title: String? = nil,
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public func presentAppStore(
animated: Bool = true,
appStoreId: String?,
appStoreURL: URL?,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static func presentAppStore(animated: Bool = true,
appStoreId: String?,
appStoreURL: URL?,
completion: (() -> Void)? = nil,
presentingViewController: UIViewController) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76