sanger/sequencescape

View on GitHub
app/models/tasks/plate_transfer_handler.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage
A
100%

Complex method Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#find_or_create_target (37.4)
Open

  def find_or_create_target(task) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
    return target_plate if target_plate.present?

    # We only eager load the request stuff if we actually need it.
    batch_requests = @batch.requests.includes(includes_for_plate_creation)

Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.

You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#find_or_create_target has approx 11 statements
Open

  def find_or_create_target(task) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler::InvalidBatch has no descriptive comment
Open

  class InvalidBatch < StandardError

Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)

Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:

# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#find_or_create_target calls 'outer_request.submission_id' 2 times
Open

          submission_id: outer_request.submission_id
        )
        TransferRequest.create!(
          asset: well_map[source.map_id],
          target_asset: outer_request.target_asset,

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#target_plate calls '@batch.requests' 2 times
Open

        .for_request(@batch.requests.first)
        .where(submission_id: @batch.requests.first.submission_id)

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#find_or_create_target calls 'well_map[source.map_id]' 2 times
Open

          target_asset: well_map[source.map_id],
          submission_id: outer_request.submission_id
        )
        TransferRequest.create!(
          asset: well_map[source.map_id],

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler has no descriptive comment
Open

module Tasks::PlateTransferHandler

Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)

Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:

# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#find_or_create_target calls 'source.map_id' 2 times
Open

          target_asset: well_map[source.map_id],
          submission_id: outer_request.submission_id
        )
        TransferRequest.create!(
          asset: well_map[source.map_id],

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#target_plate calls '@batch.requests.first' 2 times
Open

        .for_request(@batch.requests.first)
        .where(submission_id: @batch.requests.first.submission_id)

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

Tasks::PlateTransferHandler#unsuitable_wells? doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

  def unsuitable_wells?(source_wells)

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status