Showing 298 of 298 total issues
Function getTransactions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public getTransactions(
direction: TransactionFetchDirection,
fromDate?: Date,
transactionIdToFocus?: number,
): void {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Possible SQL injection Open
"transaction_headers.transaction_date #{LEDGER_QUERY_OPTS[opts[:direction]][:order]}",
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Function save
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public save(
schedule: ScheduledTransaction,
): angular.IPromise<ScheduledTransaction> {
// If the payee, category, subcategory or security are new; flush the $http cache
if ("string" === typeof (schedule as PayeeCashTransaction).payee) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public constructor(
private readonly $uibModal: UibModalMock = {
open(options: angular.ui.bootstrap.IModalSettings): {
result: UibModalMockResult;
} {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function updateLruCaches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private updateLruCaches(
transaction: Transaction,
): angular.IPromise<Transaction> {
// Create a deferred so that we return a promise
const q: angular.IDeferred<Transaction> = this.$q.defer();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Expected (<color>) but found 'var(--state-success-text)'.</color> Open
color: var(--state-success-text);
- Exclude checks
@import prevents parallel downloads, use <link> instead. Open
@import "~/loot/css/variables.css";
- Exclude checks
Expected (<color>) but found 'var(--state-warning-text)'.</color> Open
color: var(--state-warning-text);
- Exclude checks
Adjoining classes: .has-action i.action.active Open
.has-action i.action.active {
- Exclude checks
Rule is empty. Open
#transactions,
- Exclude checks
Unexpected token '&' at line 13, col 2. Open
&.taxdeductible {
- Exclude checks
Fallback background-color (hex or RGB) should precede RGBA background-color. Open
background-color: rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.1);
- Exclude checks
Unexpected token '&' at line 35, col 3. Open
&.transaction-date {
- Exclude checks
Rule is empty. Open
strong,
- Exclude checks
Unexpected token '&' at line 9, col 2. Open
&.noreceipt {
- Exclude checks
Don't use IDs in selectors. Open
#transactions,
- Exclude checks
Element (tr.future) is overqualified, just use .future without element name. Open
tr:not(.future) + tr.future {
- Exclude checks
Expected RBRACE at line 31, col 3. Open
&.has-dropdown {
- Exclude checks
@import prevents parallel downloads, use <link> instead. Open
@import "~/loot/css/variables.css";
- Exclude checks
Don't use IDs in selectors. Open
#transactions-header {
- Exclude checks