Sign upLogin

sertansenturk/tomato

View on GitHub
Star
src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 wks
Test Coverage

Function correct_jumps has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def correct_jumps(self, pitch):
        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 6):
            if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function correct_octave_errors_by_chunks has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def correct_octave_errors_by_chunks(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        zero_chunks = []
        zero_ind = []
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function decompose_into_chunks has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def decompose_into_chunks(self, pitch):
        """
        decomposes the given pitch track into the chunks.
        """
        pitch_chunks = []
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method correct_octave_errors_by_chunks. (30)
Open

    def correct_octave_errors_by_chunks(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        zero_chunks = []
        zero_ind = []
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method correct_jumps. (27)
Open

    def correct_jumps(self, pitch):
        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 6):
            if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method filter_noise_region. (17)
Open

    def filter_noise_region(self, pitch):
        for i in range(3):
            for j in range(1, len(pitch) - 2):
                if not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 1][1]):
Severity: Minor
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
Open

                if ((self.are_close(pitch_chunks[i][0][1] / 2.,
                                    pitch_chunks[i - 1][-1][1]) and
                     (pitch_chunks[i][-1][1] / 1.5 >
                      pitch_chunks[i + 1][0][1])) or
                    (self.are_close(med_chunk_i / 2., med_chunk_prev) and
Severity: Critical
Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method decompose_into_chunks. (12)
    Open

        def decompose_into_chunks(self, pitch):
        """
        decomposes the given pitch track into the chunks.
        """
        pitch_chunks = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method correct_oct_error. (12)
    Open

        def correct_oct_error(self, pitch):
        pitch_series = [pitch[i][1] for i in range(len(pitch))]
        midf0 = (np.median(pitch_series) + np.mean(pitch_series)) / 2

        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 2):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    File pitchfilter.py has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    # Copyright 2014 - 2018 Hasan Sercan Atlı & Sertan Şentürk
#
# This file is part of tomato: https://github.com/sertansenturk/tomato/
#
# tomato is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
    Severity: Minor
    Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method post_filter_chunks. (11)
      Open

          def post_filter_chunks(self, pitch_chunks):
        """
        Postfilter for the pitchChunks
        deletes the zero chunks
        deletes the chunks smaller than 50 samples(default)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method remove_extreme_values. (10)
      Open

          @staticmethod
    def remove_extreme_values(pitch):
        pitch_series = [element[1] for element in pitch]
        pitch_max = max(pitch_series)
        pitch_mean = np.mean(pitch_series)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in class PitchFilter. (10)
      Open

      class PitchFilter:
    def __init__(self, lower_interval_thres=0.7, upper_interval_thres=1.3,
                 min_chunk_size=40, min_freq=64, max_freq=1024):
        # the smallest value the interval can stay before a new chunk is formed
        self.lower_interval_thres = lower_interval_thres
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function correct_oct_error has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def correct_oct_error(self, pitch):
        pitch_series = [pitch[i][1] for i in range(len(pitch))]
        midf0 = (np.median(pitch_series) + np.mean(pitch_series)) / 2

        for i in range(4, len(pitch) - 2):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method filter_chunks_by_energy. (9)
      Open

          def filter_chunks_by_energy(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        chunk_length = [len(element) for element in pitch_chunks]
        longest_chunk = pitch_chunks[chunk_length.index(max(chunk_length))]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py by radon

      Cyclomatic Complexity

      Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

      Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

      Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
      if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
      elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
      else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
      for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
      while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
      except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
      finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
      with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
      assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
      Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
      Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

      Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

      Function filter_noise_region has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def filter_noise_region(self, pitch):
        for i in range(3):
            for j in range(1, len(pitch) - 2):
                if not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 1][1]):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function remove_extreme_values has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def remove_extreme_values(pitch):
        pitch_series = [element[1] for element in pitch]
        pitch_max = max(pitch_series)
        pitch_mean = np.mean(pitch_series)
        pitch_std = np.std(pitch_series)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function filter_chunks_by_energy has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def filter_chunks_by_energy(self, pitch):
        pitch_chunks = self.decompose_into_chunks(pitch=pitch)

        chunk_length = [len(element) for element in pitch_chunks]
        longest_chunk = pitch_chunks[chunk_length.index(max(chunk_length))]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
      Open

                  if not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1]) and \
                    not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 1][1]) and \
                    not self.are_close(pitch[i + 1][1], pitch[i + 2][1]) and \
                    not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i + 1][1]) and \
                    not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 2][1]) and \
      Severity: Major
      Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 40 mins to fix

        Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def __init__(self, lower_interval_thres=0.7, upper_interval_thres=1.3,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if self.are_close(pitch[i + 4][1], pitch[i + 5][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i + 5][1], pitch[i + 6][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) and \
                            not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 4][1]):
                        pitch[i][1] = pitch[i - 1][1]
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 219..228
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 231..240

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 365.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if self.are_close(pitch[i + 3][1], pitch[i + 4][1]) \
                        and self.are_close(pitch[i + 4][1], pitch[i + 5][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) \
                            and not self.are_close(pitch[i][1],
                                                   pitch[i + 3][1]):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 208..216
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 231..240

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 365.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if self.are_close(pitch[i + 2][1], pitch[i + 3][1]) and \
                        self.are_close(pitch[i + 3][1], pitch[i + 4][1]):
                    if not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i - 1][1]) and \
                            not self.are_close(pitch[i][1], pitch[i + 2][1]):
                        pitch[i][1] = pitch[i - 1][1]
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 3 days to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 208..216
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 219..228

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 365.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 4][1]):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 203..205

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 136.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if self.are_close(pitch[i - 4][1], pitch[i - 3][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 3][1], pitch[i - 2][1]) and \
                    self.are_close(pitch[i - 2][1], pitch[i - 1][1]):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 256..258

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 136.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if pitch[i + 1][1] == 0:
                    temp_pitch.append(pitch[i])
                    if i + 1 == len(pitch) - 1:  # last element
                        temp_pitch.append(pitch[i + 1])
                else:
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 98..110

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 96.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if (self.lower_interval_thres < interval <
                        self.upper_interval_thres):
                    temp_pitch.append(pitch[i])
                    if i + 1 == len(pitch) - 1:  # last element
                        temp_pitch.append(pitch[i + 1])
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 5 hrs to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 83..94

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 96.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          interval = float(pitch[i + 1][1]) / float(pitch[i][1])
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/joint/alignedpitchfilter.py on lines 191..191

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 49.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          elif (self.are_close(pitch_chunks[i][0][1] * 2.,
                                     pitch_chunks[i - 1][-1][1]) and
                      (pitch_chunks[i][-1][1] * 1.5 <
                       pitch_chunks[i + 1][0][1])) or \
                     (self.are_close(med_chunk_i * 2., med_chunk_prev) and
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 187..194

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if ((self.are_close(pitch_chunks[i][0][1] / 2.,
                                    pitch_chunks[i - 1][-1][1]) and
                     (pitch_chunks[i][-1][1] / 1.5 >
                      pitch_chunks[i + 1][0][1])) or
                    (self.are_close(med_chunk_i / 2., med_chunk_prev) and
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 168..175

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          elif (self.are_close(pitch_chunks[i][-1][1] / 2.,
                                     pitch_chunks[i + 1][0][1]) and
                      (pitch_chunks[i][0][1] / 1.5 >
                       pitch_chunks[i - 1][-1][1])) or \
                     (self.are_close(med_chunk_i / 2., med_chunk_follow) and
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 159..166

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          elif ((pitch_chunks[i][0][1] * 1.5 <
                       pitch_chunks[i - 1][-1][1] and
                       self.are_close(pitch_chunks[i][-1][1] * 2.,
                                      pitch_chunks[i + 1][0][1])) or
                      (self.are_close(med_chunk_prev * 2, med_chunk_follow)
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 178..185

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 45.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                              elif self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1] * 4):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 265..265

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                              if self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1] * 2):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 267..267

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                              elif self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1] / 4.):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 260..260

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                              if self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1] / 2.):
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 262..262

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                                  not self.are_close(pitch[j - 1][1], pitch[j][1]) and \
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 307..307
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 313..313
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 322..322

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 42.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1]) and \
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 313..313
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 314..314
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 322..322

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 42.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if not self.are_close(pitch[i - 1][1], pitch[i][1]) and \
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 307..307
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 313..313
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 314..314

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 42.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                          if not self.are_close(pitch[j - 2][1], pitch[j][1]) and \
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 307..307
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 314..314
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 322..322

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 42.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if pitch[j][1] >= pitch_max:
                pitch[j][1] = 0
                pitch[j][2] = 0
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 298..300
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 307..310

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 35.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      if pitch[j][1] <= pitch_min:
                pitch[j][1] = 0
                pitch[j][2] = 0
          Severity: Major
          Found in src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py and 2 other locations - About 45 mins to fix
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 291..293
          src/tomato/audio/pitchfilter.py on lines 307..310

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 35.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status