Showing 33 of 33 total issues
Method publish
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Command(
name = "publish",
description = "Publish translations to Translation Hosting. Use 'simplelocalize publish --help' to learn more about the parameters.")
public void publish(
@Option(names = {"--apiKey"}, description = "Project API Key") String apiKey,
Method download
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Option(names = {"--apiKey"}, description = "Project API Key") String apiKey,
@Option(names = {"--downloadPath"}, description = "Directory where translations should be downloaded") String downloadPath,
@Option(names = {"--downloadFormat"}, description = "Translations file format") String downloadFormat,
@Option(names = {"--downloadOptions"}, split = ",", description = "(Optional) Download options") List<String> downloadOptions,
@Option(names = {"--downloadSort"}, description = "(Optional) Download sorting") String downloadSort,
Method pull
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Option(names = {"--apiKey"}, description = "Project API Key") String apiKey,
@Option(names = {"--pullPath"}, description = "Directory where translations should be saved") String pullPath,
@Option(names = {"--environment"}, description = "Translation Hosting environment ('latest' or 'production')") String environment,
@Option(names = {"--filterRegex"}, description = "(Optional) Filter which resources should be downloaded") String filterRegex,
@Option(names = {"--baseUrl"}, description = "(Optional) Set custom server URL") String baseUrl
Method invoke
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void invoke() throws IOException, InterruptedException
{
String responseData = client.fetchProject();
DocumentContext json = jsonReader.read(responseData);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private Set<String> matchI18n(String fileContent) {
fileContent = fileContent.replaceAll("\\s+", "");
return Pattern.compile("(?<=<%=i18n\\.)(.*?)(?=%>)")
.matcher(fileContent)
.results()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private Set<String> matchIntlFormatMessageIds(String fileContent) {
fileContent = fileContent.replaceAll("\\s+", "");
return Pattern.compile("(?<=intl\\.formatMessage\\(\\{id:[\"|'])(.*?)(?=[\"|'])")
.matcher(fileContent)
.results()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (Path javaFile : combinedLists)
{
Set<String> chunk = DefaultKeysExtractor.extractValuesByPattern(javaFile, Pattern.compile("(?<=R\\.string\\.)(.*?)(?=\\))"));
output.addAll(ExtractionResult.fromCollection(chunk, javaFile));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (Path path : swiftFiles)
{
Set<String> chunk = DefaultKeysExtractor.extractValuesByPattern(path, Pattern.compile("(?<=NSLocalizedString\\(\")(.*?)(?=\")"));
output.addAll(ExtractionResult.fromCollection(chunk, path));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (Path xmlFile : xmlFiles)
{
Set<String> chunk = DefaultKeysExtractor.extractValuesByPattern(xmlFile, Pattern.compile("(?<=android:text=\"@string/)(.*?)(?=\")"));
output.addAll(ExtractionResult.fromCollection(chunk, xmlFile));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method isMultiLanguage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean isMultiLanguage(Configuration configuration)
{
List<String> multiLanguageFileFormats = List.of("multi-language-json", "excel", "csv-translations");
for (String uploadFormat : multiLanguageFileFormats)
{
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method trySendException
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void trySendException(Exception exception)
{
try
{
SimpleLocalizeClient client = SimpleLocalizeClient.create(effectiveCommandConfiguration.getBaseUrl(), effectiveCommandConfiguration.getApiKey());
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createHttpClient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static HttpClient createHttpClient()
{
HttpClient.Builder builder = HttpClient
.newBuilder()
.connectTimeout(Duration.ofMinutes(5));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pull
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Command(
name = "pull",
description = "Pull translations from Translation Hosting Use 'simplelocalize pull --help' to learn more about the parameters.")
public void pull(
@Option(names = {"--apiKey"}, description = "Project API Key") String apiKey,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"