Sign upLogin

skofgar/mercury

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 821 of 821 total issues

Method makeConnection has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void makeConnection(int idleSeconds) {
        if (!running) {
            return;
        }
        if (urls.isEmpty()) {
Severity: Minor
Found in system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/websocket/client/PersistentWsClient.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method handleEvent has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public Object handleEvent(Map<String, String> headers, Object body, int instance) throws Exception {
        if (connected && !ws.isClosed()) {
            if (body instanceof byte[]) {
                ws.writeBinaryMessage(Buffer.buffer((byte[]) body));
Severity: Minor
Found in system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/websocket/client/WsClientTransmitter.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method request has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public EventEnvelope request(String to, long timeout, Object body) throws IOException, TimeoutException, AppException {
        if (body instanceof Kv) {
            // in case if a single KV is sent
            Kv kv = (Kv) body;
            if (kv.key != null && kv.value != null) {
Severity: Minor
Found in system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method subscribe has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public void subscribe(String topic, int partition, LambdaFunction listener, String... parameters) throws IOException {
        ConnectorConfig.validateTopicName(topic);
        String topicPartition = (topic + (partition < 0? "" : "." + partition)).toLowerCase();
        if (parameters.length == 2 || parameters.length == 3) {
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/adapters/kafka/kafka-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/kafka/services/PubSubManager.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method getFiles has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private List<String> getFiles() {
        List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();
        if (dir.exists() && dir.isDirectory()) {
            File[] files = dir.listFiles();
            for (File f: files) {
Severity: Minor
Found in extensions/api-playground/src/main/java/com/accenture/examples/servlets/HomePage.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method subscribe has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public void subscribe(String topic, int partition, LambdaFunction listener, String... parameters) throws IOException {
        ConnectorConfig.validateTopicName(topic);
        String topicPartition = (topic + (partition < 0? "" : "." + partition)).toLowerCase();
        if (parameters.length == 2 || parameters.length == 3) {
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/adapters/hazelcast/hazelcast-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/hazelcast/services/PubSubManager.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method start has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public void start() throws IOException {
        final boolean requireInitialization = offset == INITIALIZE;
        if (requireInitialization) {
            ServiceLifeCycle initialLoad = new ServiceLifeCycle(topic, partition, INIT_TOKEN);
            initialLoad.start();
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/adapters/hazelcast/hazelcast-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/hazelcast/services/EventConsumer.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method sendEvent has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void sendEvent(String topic, int partition, List<Header> headers, byte[] payload) {
        Utility util = Utility.getInstance();
        final String realTopic;
        final int realPartition;
        String virtualTopic = topic + (partition < 0? "" : "." + partition);
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/adapters/kafka/kafka-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/kafka/services/PubSubManager.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method mapFromEvent has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static Map<String, Object> mapFromEvent(EventEnvelope event) {
        Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>();
        result.put(ID, event.getId());
        if (event.getTo() != null) {
            result.put(TO, event.getTo());
Severity: Minor
Found in language-packs/language-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/lang/websocket/server/LanguageConnector.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method subscribe has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public void subscribe(String topic, int partition, LambdaFunction listener, String... parameters) throws IOException {
        ConnectorConfig.validateTopicName(topic);
        String topicPartition = (topic + (partition < 0? "" : "." + partition)).toLowerCase();
        if (parameters.length == 2 || parameters.length == 3) {
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/adapters/activemq/activemq-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/activemq/services/PubSubManager.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method notifyLifeCycleSubscribers has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void notifyLifeCycleSubscribers(Kv...parameters) {
        if (!lifeCycleSubscribers.isEmpty()) {
            for (String subscriber: lifeCycleSubscribers.keySet()) {
                try {
                    EventEnvelope event = new EventEnvelope().setTo(subscriber);
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method notifyPmSubscribers has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    private void notifyPmSubscribers(Kv...parameters) {
        if (!pmSubscribers.isEmpty()) {
            for (String subscriber: pmSubscribers.keySet()) {
                try {
                    EventEnvelope event = new EventEnvelope().setTo(subscriber);
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (status >= 500) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_500_WARNING);
            } else if (status >= 400) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_400_WARNING);
            } else {
Severity: Major
Found in system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/spring/system/HttpErrorHandler.java and 2 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/automation/util/SimpleHttpUtility.java on lines 173..179
system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/rest/exception/RestExceptionHandler.java on lines 170..176

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        LambdaFunction echo = (headers, body, instance) -> {
            Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>();
            result.put("headers", headers);
            result.put("body", body);
            result.put("instance", instance);
Severity: Minor
Found in extensions/api-playground/src/main/java/com/accenture/examples/MainApp.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
examples/rest-example/src/main/java/com/accenture/examples/MainApp.java on lines 50..63

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (status >= 500) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_500_WARNING);
            } else if (status >= 400) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_400_WARNING);
            } else {
Severity: Major
Found in system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/rest/exception/RestExceptionHandler.java and 2 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/automation/util/SimpleHttpUtility.java on lines 173..179
system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/spring/system/HttpErrorHandler.java on lines 127..133

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

            if (status >= 500) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_500_WARNING);
            } else if (status >= 400) {
                errorPage = errorPage.replace(SET_WARNING, HTTP_400_WARNING);
            } else {
Severity: Major
Found in system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/automation/util/SimpleHttpUtility.java and 2 other locations - About 55 mins to fix
system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/rest/exception/RestExceptionHandler.java on lines 170..176
system/rest-spring/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/spring/system/HttpErrorHandler.java on lines 127..133

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                    if (origin.equals(myOrigin) && !headers.containsKey(IS_FINAL)) {
                        // broadcast to peers
                        EventEnvelope request = new EventEnvelope();
                        request.setTo(ServiceDiscovery.SERVICE_REGISTRY + APP_GROUP + closedUserGroup)
                                .setHeaders(headers).setHeader(IS_FINAL, true);
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java on lines 334..340

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        LambdaFunction echo = (headers, body, instance) -> {
            /*
             * Uncomment the "log.info" statement if you want to see this service receiving the event.
             */
//             log.info("echo #{} got a request", instance);
Severity: Minor
Found in examples/rest-example/src/main/java/com/accenture/examples/MainApp.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
extensions/api-playground/src/main/java/com/accenture/examples/MainApp.java on lines 51..58

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                if (origin.equals(myOrigin) && !headers.containsKey(IS_FINAL)) {
                    // broadcast to peers
                    EventEnvelope request = new EventEnvelope();
                    request.setTo(ServiceDiscovery.SERVICE_REGISTRY + APP_GROUP + closedUserGroup)
                            .setHeaders(headers).setHeader(IS_FINAL, true);
Severity: Minor
Found in connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
connectors/core/cloud-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/cloud/services/ServiceRegistry.java on lines 295..301

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 64.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public String zeroFill(int seq, int max) {
        int len = String.valueOf(max).length();
        String value = String.valueOf(seq);
        return value.length() < len? ZEROS.substring(0, len - value.length()) + value : value;
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/util/Utility.java and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/util/Utility.java on lines 193..197

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 63.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language