skofgar/mercury

View on GitHub

Showing 821 of 821 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public AsyncHttpRequest setUploadTag(String tag) {
        if (tag != null) {
            String value = tag.trim();
            this.upload = value.isEmpty()? null : value;
        } else {
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/models/AsyncHttpRequest.java on lines 333..341

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        while (normal) {
            long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
            if (now - t0 > ONE_MINUTE) {
                t0 = now;
                removeExpiredFiles();
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/ObjectStreamIO.java on lines 253..265

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static synchronized void stopConnection(String domain) {
        Connection connection = allConnections.get(domain);
        if (connection != null) {
            try {
                allConnections.remove(domain);
connectors/adapters/tibco/tibco-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/tibco/TibcoConnector.java on lines 163..174

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (parameters != null) {
            for (Kv kv: parameters) {
                if (kv.key != null && kv.value != null) {
                    event.setHeader(kv.key, kv.value);
                }
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 529..535
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 554..560
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 797..803

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static synchronized void stopConnection(String domain) {
        Connection connection = allConnections.get(domain);
        if (connection != null) {
            try {
                allConnections.remove(domain);
connectors/adapters/activemq/activemq-connector/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/activemq/ArtemisConnector.java on lines 135..146

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (parameters != null) {
            for (Kv kv: parameters) {
                if (kv.key != null && kv.value != null) {
                    event.setHeader(kv.key, kv.value);
                }
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 529..535
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 797..803
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 846..852

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (parameters != null) {
            for (Kv kv: parameters) {
                if (kv.key != null && kv.value != null) {
                    event.setHeader(kv.key, kv.value);
                }
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 554..560
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 797..803
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 846..852

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        if (parameters != null) {
            for (Kv kv: parameters) {
                if (kv.key != null && kv.value != null) {
                    event.setHeader(kv.key, kv.value);
                }
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 529..535
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 554..560
system/platform-core/src/main/java/org/platformlambda/core/system/PostOffice.java on lines 846..852

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 56.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                                        for (String secondary : evt.services) {
                                            if (!secondary.equals(evt.primary)) {
                                                EventEnvelope copy = new EventEnvelope()
                                                                            .setTo(secondary).setBody(evt.httpRequest);
                                                if (evt.tracing) {

    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
    Open

                            if (file.equals(ifNoneMatch)) {
                                response.setStatusCode(304);
                                response.putHeader(CONTENT_LEN, String.valueOf(0));
                            } else {
                                response.putHeader(ETAG, file.eTag);

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

                              if (contentLen > 0) {
                                  String filename = request.getFileName();
                                  if (contentType != null && contentType.startsWith(MULTIPART_FORM_DATA) &&
                                                                              POST.equals(method) && filename != null) {
                                      String id = util.getUuid();

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                                    if (text.length() == 0) {
                                        return resEvent.setBody(new HashMap<>());
                                    } else {
                                        if (text.startsWith("{") && text.endsWith("}")) {
                                            return resEvent.setBody(SimpleMapper.getInstance().getMapper().readValue(text, Map.class));

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                                  if (urlRewrite.size() == 2) {
                                      info.urlRewrite = urlRewrite;
                                  } else {
                                      log.error("Skipping entry with invalid {} - {}. It should contain a list of 2 prefixes",
                                              URL_REWRITE, urlRewrite);

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                                    if (uri.equalsIgnoreCase(index)) {
                                        String q = req.getQueryString();
                                        res.sendRedirect(uri+indexPage + (q == null? "" : "?"+q));
                                        return;
                                    }

              Method write has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  @Override
                  public void write(Object o, MediaType contentType, HttpOutputMessage outputMessage)
                          throws HttpMessageNotWritableException, IOException {
                      outputMessage.getHeaders().setContentType(HTML_CONTENT);
                      // this may be too late to validate because Spring RestController has already got the object

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method readFrom has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public T readFrom(Class<T> type, Type genericType, Annotation[] annotations, MediaType mediaType,
                                    MultivaluedMap<String, String> httpHeaders, InputStream entityStream)

                Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                Open

                                        if (parts.size() == 2) {
                                            String authHeader = parts.get(0);
                                            String authService = parts.get(1);
                                            if (util.validServiceName(authService)) {
                                                if (DEFAULT_VALUE.equals(authHeader)) {

                  Method write has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      public void write(byte[] payload, int start, int end) throws IOException {
                          if (payload == null) {
                              // null payload means EOF
                              close();
                          } else {

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                  Open

                                          if (svc == null) {
                                              svc = route.info.getAuthService(h, v);
                                          }

                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                    Open

                                            if (key.equals(STREAM) && value.startsWith(STREAM_PREFIX) && value.contains("@")) {
                                                streamId = evtHeaders.get(h);
                                            } else if (key.equalsIgnoreCase(TIMEOUT)) {
                                                timeoutOverride = evtHeaders.get(h);
                                            } else if (key.equalsIgnoreCase(CONTENT_TYPE)) {
                      Severity
                      Category
                      Status
                      Source
                      Language