Showing 537 of 537 total issues
Method getSchema
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Schema
getSchema(Source source, ThreadContext context)
{
InputStream is;
VerifierFactory factory = new com.thaiopensource.relaxng.jarv.VerifierFactoryImpl();
Method op_or
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod(name = {"|", "+"})
public IRubyObject
op_or(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject nodeSet)
{
IRubyObject[] otherNodes = getNodes(context, nodeSet);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method accept
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void
accept(ThreadContext context, SaveContextVisitor visitor)
{
Document document = getDocument();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method namespace_scopes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod
public RubyArray<?>
namespace_scopes(ThreadContext context)
{
final XmlDocument doc = document(context.runtime);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method op_diff
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod(name = "-")
public IRubyObject
op_diff(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject nodeSet)
{
IRubyObject[] otherNodes = getNodes(context, nodeSet);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_namespace_definition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JRubyMethod(name = {"add_namespace_definition", "add_namespace"})
public IRubyObject
add_namespace_definition(ThreadContext context, IRubyObject prefix, IRubyObject href)
{
String hrefStr, prefixStr = prefix.isNil() ? null : prefix.convertToString().decodeString();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createAndCacheNamespaces
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void
createAndCacheNamespaces(Ruby runtime, Node node)
{
if (node.hasAttributes()) {
NamedNodeMap nodeMap = node.getAttributes();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handleParent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected void
handleParent(Element e, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
{
if (!e.hasAttributes() && e.getNamespaceURI() == null) {
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(string_or_io, url = nil, encoding = nil, **options, &block)
yield options if block
string_or_io = "" unless string_or_io
if string_or_io.respond_to?(:encoding) && string_or_io.encoding != Encoding::ASCII_8BIT
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(document, tags = nil, ctx = nil, options = XML::ParseOptions::DEFAULT_HTML) # rubocop:disable Lint/MissingSuper
return self unless tags
options = Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions.new(options) if Integer === options
@parse_options = options
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method handleAttributesSubtree
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected Iterator<Attr>
handleAttributesSubtree(Element element, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
throws CanonicalizationException
{
Method handleAttributesSubtree
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected Iterator<Attr>
handleAttributesSubtree(Element element, NameSpaceSymbTable ns)
throws CanonicalizationException
{
Method outputPItoWriter
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected void
outputPItoWriter(
ProcessingInstruction currentPI, OutputStream writer, int position
) throws IOException
{
Method compare
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public int
compare(Attr attr0, Attr attr1)
{
String namespaceURI0 = attr0.getNamespaceURI();
String namespaceURI1 = attr1.getNamespaceURI();
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((prefix == null) || (prefix.length() == 0)) {
result = doc.createElementNS(namespace, localName);
result.setAttributeNS(Constants.NamespaceSpecNS, "xmlns", namespace);
} else {
result = doc.createElementNS(namespace, prefix + ":" + localName);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((prefix == null) || (prefix.length() == 0)) {
result = doc.createElementNS(namespace, localName);
result.setAttributeNS(Constants.NamespaceSpecNS, "xmlns", namespace);
} else {
result = doc.createElementNS(namespace, prefix + ":" + localName);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method resolveEntity
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected InputSource
resolveEntity(Ruby runtime, String name, String publicId, String baseURI, String systemId)
throws IOException, SAXException
{
InputSource s = new InputSource();
Method getXmlnsAttr
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
void
getXmlnsAttr(Collection<Attr> col)
{
int size = levels.size() - 1;
if (cur == null) {
Method enter
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public boolean
enter(Node node)
{
if (node instanceof Document) {
return enter((Document)node);
Method populateNokogiriClassCache
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Map<String, RubyClass>
populateNokogiriClassCache(Ruby ruby)
{
Map<String, RubyClass> nokogiriClassCache = new HashMap<String, RubyClass>();
nokogiriClassCache.put("Nokogiri::HTML4::Document", (RubyClass)ruby.getClassFromPath("Nokogiri::HTML4::Document"));