Showing 116 of 116 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(hash = nil)
super(hash)
@endpoints = []
return if hash.nil?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 34.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.listitem(body);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.blockquote(body);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return Parser.parse(Lexer.lex(src, opt), opt);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return '<p>An error occured:</p><pre>'
+ escape(e.message + '', true)
+ '</pre>';
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.html(html);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.paragraph(this.parseText());
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :idle if gear_groups[0][:gears].all? { |gear| gear[:state] == 'idle' }
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.table(header, body);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.listitem(body);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.list(body, ordered);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return this.renderer.paragraph(this.inline.output(this.token.text));
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return Enums::ApplicationStates::IDLE if dynos_idle?(dynos)
Method link_resource
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def link_resource(namespaces = nil, instance_or_id = nil)
namespaces = [] if namespaces.nil?
id = ''
if instance_or_id.respond_to?('id')
id = instance_or_id.id unless instance_or_id.id.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_region(application)
return unless application.key?(:region)
found_region = native_region(application[:region])
if found_region.nil?
raise Errors::SemanticAdapterRequestError,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method open_db
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def open_db
db_backend = chosen_db_backend
unless allowed_backends.key?(db_backend)
raise StandardError,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_application
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_application(application)
# updates the application with a valid region identity
retrieve_region(application)
# Heroku does not support autoscale
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method requirements
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.requirements(api_version)
return @requirements[api_version] unless @requirements.nil? || @requirements[api_version].nil?
# this is not the schema, but the requirements file (!)
api_requirements_file = "#{Nucleus::API.src}/api/versions/#{api_version}/requirements.yml"
schema_file = 'schemas/api.requirements.schema.yml'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_region(application)
return unless application.key?(:region)
found_region = native_region(application[:region])
if found_region.nil?
raise Errors::SemanticAdapterRequestError,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method zip
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def zip(path)
string_io = Zip::OutputStream.write_buffer do |zio|
Find.find(path) do |file|
# do not process directories && do not include the Git DB files
next if File.directory?(file) || (@exclude_git && file.start_with?("#{path}/.git"))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"