Showing 134 of 134 total issues
Method render_union
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_union(out, union)
out.puts "define_type(\"#{name union}\", Union,"
out.indent do
out.puts "switch_type: #{type_reference union.discriminant.type},"
out.puts "switch_name: :#{member_name union.discriminant},"
Method encode_member
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
Method decode_innervalue_member
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_innervalue_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
Method decode_member
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
Method encode_innervalue_member
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_innervalue_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
Method encode_member
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
Method render_enum
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_enum(enum, out)
out.balance_after /,[\s]*/ do
enum.members.each_with_index do |em, index|
out.puts "#{em.name}(#{em.value})#{index == enum.members.size - 1 ? ';' : ','}"
end
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case arm
when AST::Definitions::UnionDefaultArm ;
out.puts "default:"
else
arm.cases.each do |kase|
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case arm
when AST::Definitions::UnionDefaultArm ;
out.puts "default:"
else
arm.cases.each do |kase|
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method encode_member
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(member, out, is_union_member = false)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
out.puts "return"
end
Method build_type_field_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_type_field_types(node)
types = Hash.new { |h, k| h[k] = [] }
ingest_node = lambda do |n|
n.definitions.each{ |nn| ingest_node.call(nn) } if n.respond_to?(:definitions)
n.nested_definitions.each{ |nn| ingest_node.call(nn) } if n.respond_to?(:nested_definitions)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method type_string
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_string(type)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Bool
"bool"
when AST::Typespecs::Double
Method reference
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reference(parent, type)
base_ref = base_reference type
parent_name = name(parent) if parent
cyclic = is_type_in_type_field_types(base_ref, parent_name)
Method render_element
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_element(defn, imports, element, post_name="implements XdrElement")
path = element.name.camelize + ".java"
name = name_string element.name
out = @output.open(path)
render_top_matter out
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def render_definition(out, defn)
render_nested_definitions(out, defn)
render_source_comment(out, defn)
case defn
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def render_definition(out, defn)
render_nested_definitions(out, defn)
render_source_comment(out, defn)
case defn
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method render_union_decode_from_interface
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_union_decode_from_interface(out, union)
name = name(union)
out.puts "// DecodeFrom decodes this value using the Decoder."
out.puts "func (u *#{name}) DecodeFrom(d *xdr.Decoder, maxDepth uint) (int, error) {"
out.puts " if maxDepth == 0 {"
Method render_typedef_decode_from_interface
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_typedef_decode_from_interface(out, typedef)
name = name(typedef)
type = typedef.declaration.type
out.puts "// DecodeFrom decodes this value using the Decoder."
out.puts "func (s *#{name}) DecodeFrom(d *xdr.Decoder, maxDepth uint) (int, error) {"
Method type_string
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_string(type)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
"Integer"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
Method decode_type
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_type(decl)
case decl.type
when AST::Typespecs::Int
"Integer.unpack(unpacker)"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt