Showing 134 of 134 total issues
Method decode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void ;
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method switch_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def switch_for(out, union, ident)
out.puts "switch #{reference union.discriminant.type}(#{ident}) {"
union.normal_arms.each do |arm|
arm.cases.each do |c|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_innervalue_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_innervalue_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_member(member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode_innervalue_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_innervalue_member(value, member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render_struct
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_struct(struct, out)
out.puts "public #{name struct} () {}"
struct.members.each do |m|
out.puts <<-EOS.strip_heredoc
public #{decl_string(m.declaration)} #{m.name.camelize} {get; set;}
Method render_definition
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_definition(defn, constants_container)
imports = Set[]
add_imports_for_definition(defn, imports)
case defn
Method decode_type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_type(decl)
case decl.type
when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
"stream.readInt()"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
Method encode_type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_type(type, value)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Int ;
"stream.writeInt(#{value})"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt ;
Method encode_type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_type(type, value)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Int
"stream.WriteInt(#{value})"
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt
Method type_string
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def type_string(type)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Int
'int'
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt
Method decode_type
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_type(type)
case type
when AST::Typespecs::Int
'stream.ReadInt()'
when AST::Typespecs::UnsignedInt
Method render_typedef_decode_from_interface
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_typedef_decode_from_interface(out, typedef)
name = name(typedef)
type = typedef.declaration.type
out.puts "// DecodeFrom decodes this value using the Decoder."
out.puts "func (s *#{name}) DecodeFrom(d *xdr.Decoder, maxDepth uint) (int, error) {"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method render_typedef
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_typedef(out, typedef)
# Typedefs that wrap a pointer type are not well supported in Go because
# Go does not allow pointer types to have methods. This prevents us from
# defining the EncodeTo method on these types which is very inconvenient
# for the render functions that generate structs that contain these
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when AST::Definitions::Struct ;
name = name ndefn
out.puts "@Data"
out.puts "@NoArgsConstructor"
out.puts "@AllArgsConstructor"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when AST::Definitions::Union ;
name = name ndefn
out.puts "@Data"
out.puts "@NoArgsConstructor"
out.puts "@AllArgsConstructor"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method definition_blocks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def definition_blocks
children.each_with_object([]) do |child, result|
next unless child.is_a?(Definitions::Base)
current_group = result.last
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_member
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_member(member, out)
case member.declaration
when AST::Declarations::Void;
out.puts "return"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"