Showing 58 of 58 total issues
Function prototype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Searcher.prototype = new function() {
// search is performed in chunks of 1000 for non-blocking user input
var CHUNK_SIZE = 1000;
// do not try to find more than 100 results
var MAX_RESULTS = 100;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has 160 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Searcher.prototype = new function() {
// search is performed in chunks of 1000 for non-blocking user input
var CHUNK_SIZE = 1000;
// do not try to find more than 100 results
var MAX_RESULTS = 100;
Method copy_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy_data( sql, coder=nil )
res = exec( sql )
case res.result_status
when PGRES_COPY_IN
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Search.prototype = $.extend({}, Navigation, new function() {
var suid = 1;
this.init = function() {
var _this = this;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Search.prototype = $.extend({}, Navigation, new function() {
var suid = 1;
this.init = function() {
var _this = this;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i=0, l = regexps.length; i < l; i++) {
result.title = result.title.replace(regexps[i], highlighters[i]);
result.namespace = result.namespace.replace(regexps[i], highlighters[i]);
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i=1, l = regexps.length; i < l; i++) {
result.title = result.title.replace(regexps[i], highlighters[i]);
result.namespace = result.namespace.replace(regexps[i], highlighters[i]);
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method filterByRecommendations
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filterByRecommendations(events, user_id)
events_attended = []
tags_list = []
tag_count = [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
recommended_events = []
Method report
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def report( opts )
db = PG.connect(
:dbname => opts.database,
:host => opts.host,
:port => opts.port,
Method parse_args
has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_args( args )
options = OpenStruct.new
options.database = Etc.getpwuid( Process.uid ).name
options.host = '127.0.0.1'
options.port = 5432
Method parse_args
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_args( args )
options = OpenStruct.new
options.database = Etc.getpwuid( Process.uid ).name
options.host = '127.0.0.1'
options.port = 5432
Method copy_data
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def copy_data( sql, coder=nil )
res = exec( sql )
case res.result_status
when PGRES_COPY_IN
Method relations
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def relations
return @relations if @relations
relations = {}
query = %q{
Method parse_args
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_args( args )
options = OpenStruct.new
options.database = Etc.getpwuid( Process.uid ).name
options.host = '127.0.0.1'
options.port = 5432
Method parse_args
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_args( args )
options = OpenStruct.new
options.database = 'postgres'
options.port = 5432
options.user = Etc.getpwuid( Process.uid ).name
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i=1, l = regexps.length; i < l; i++) {
if (!index.match(regexps[i]) && !longIndex.match(regexps[i]))
return false;
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i=1, l = regexps.length; i < l; i++) {
if (!index.match(regexps[i]) && !longIndex.match(regexps[i]))
return false;
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i=1, l = regexps.length; i < l; i++) {
if (!index.match(regexps[i]) && !longIndex.match(regexps[i]))
return false;
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 71.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(user_id, location, near_me, other, time, tag, recommend)
@events = Event.all
if recommend == "true"
@events = filterByRecommendations(@events, user_id)
@events = Filter.addAttendancestoEvents(@events)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method filterByOther
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filterByOther(events, user_id, other)
friend_events = []
my_friends = []
@users_friendships = Friendship.where(user_id: user_id)
@users_friendships.each do |friendship|