Showing 29 of 29 total issues
Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
if (c === _) return curry1((c, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
return curry1((b, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
if (c === _) return curry2((b, c, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
if (b === _) return curry2((b, d, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
return curry2((c, d, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
if (a === _) return curry3((a, c, d, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
return curry2((a, d, e, f) => fn(a, b, c, d, e, f))Avoid too many return statements within this function. Open
Open
return _omitBy(
{ ...defaultedObject, ...resolvedUpdates },
(value) => value === innerOmitted
)Function update has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
function update(updates, object, ...args) {
if (typeof updates === 'function') {
return updates(object, ...args)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"