Showing 234 of 234 total issues
Method handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle(request)
scopus_query = scopus_query(request)
# we can't make a good query, nevermind.
return request.dispatched(self, true) if scopus_query.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method enhance_referent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enhance_referent(request, perl_data)
ActiveRecord::Base.connection_pool.with_connection do
metadata = request.referent.metadata
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File internet_archive.rb
has 342 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class InternetArchive < Service
require 'open-uri' #
require 'cgi'
require 'multi_json' #we ask IA for json
require 'timeout' # used to timeout our requests
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if options[:coverage_sensitive] == true
# roll up targets with same prefix only if coverage is a strict
# subset of an existing one. If two are equal, take first.
list = list.reject.each_with_index do |item, index|
prefix = prefixes.find {|p| item[:sfx_target_name].start_with?(p)}
Method gen_lamr_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def gen_lamr_request(request)
output = ""
builder = Builder::XmlMarkup.new(:target => output, :indent => 2)
builder.instruct!(:xml, :encoding => "UTF-8")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method included
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.included(klass)
klass.class_eval do
self.table_name = 'AZ_TITLE'
self.primary_key = 'AZ_TITLE_ID'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_copies
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_copies(request, bib_array, options = {})
#debugger
# default
options[:match_reliability] ||= ServiceResponse::MatchExact
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function HtmlUpdater
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function HtmlUpdater(first_arg, second_arg, third_arg) {
if (typeof(first_arg) == "object") {
// Simply merge arguments object as properties on ourselves.
$.extend(this, first_arg);
} else {
Method handle
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle(request)
# Only do anything if we have no holdings results from someone else.
holdings = request.service_types.where(:service_type_value_name => "holding")
File bootstrap3-typeahead.js
has 307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* =============================================================
* bootstrap3-typeahead.js v3.0.3
* https://github.com/bassjobsen/Bootstrap-3-Typeahead
* =============================================================
* Original written by @mdo and @fat
Method add_aws_service_responses
has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_aws_service_responses(request, aws_response)
return_hash = Hash.new
aws = Nokogiri::XML(aws_response.body)
# extract and collect info from the xml
Class WorldcatIdentities
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WorldcatIdentities < Service
require 'open-uri' # SRU is too slow even though we use an SRU-like link
require 'nokogiri'
include MetadataHelper
Method handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle(request)
scopus_search = scopus_search(request)
# we can't make a good query, nevermind.
return request.dispatched(self, true) if scopus_search.blank?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document).on("show.bs.collapse", ".collapse", function(event) {
// Update the icon
$(this).parent().find('.collapse-toggle i').removeClass("umlaut_icons-list-closed").addClass("umlaut_icons-list-open");
// Update the action label
$(this).parent().find(".expand_contract_action_label").text("Hide ");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(document).on("hide.bs.collapse", ".collapse", function(event) {
// Update the icon
$(this).parent().find('.collapse-toggle i').removeClass("umlaut_icons-list-open").addClass("umlaut_icons-list-closed");
// Update the action label
$(this).parent().find(".expand_contract_action_label").text("Show ");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method should_skip_menu
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def should_skip_menu
# From usabilty test, do NOT skip if coming from A-Z list/journal lookup.
# First, is it over-ridden in url?
if ( params['umlaut.skip_resolve_menu'] == 'false')
return nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method brief_citation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def brief_citation(request, options = {})
options[:include_labels] ||= false
rv =""
cite = request.referent.to_citation
title = truncate(cite[:title].strip, :length => 70, :separator => ' ')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_query(request)
# get the search terms for use in both fulltext search and highlighted_link
# IA does index apostrophes, although not generally other puncutation. Need to keep em.
search_terms = {:title => get_search_title(request.referent ,:keep_apostrophes=>true),
:creator => get_search_creator(request.referent)}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method http_fetch
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def http_fetch(uri, options = {})
options[:max_redirects] ||= 8
options[:redirects_left] ||= options[:max_redirects]
options[:raise_on_http_error_code] = true unless options.has_key?(:raise_on_http_error_code)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method normalize_title
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def normalize_title(arg_title, options = {})
# default options
options[:rstrip_parens] ||= true
options[:remove_all_parens] ||= true
options[:strip_gmd] ||= true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"