File form_helper.rb
has 366 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module FormHelper
def text_f(f, attr, options = {})
field(f, attr, options) do
addClass options, "form-control"
options[:focus_on_load] = true if options[:focus_on_load].nil? && attr.to_s == 'name'
Method select_f
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_f(f, attr, array, id, method, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
array = array.to_a.dup
disable_button = select_options.delete(:disable_button)
include_blank = select_options.delete(:include_blank)
disable_button_enabled = select_options.delete(:disable_button_enabled)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method field
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def field(f, attr, options = {})
table_field = options.delete(:table_field)
error = options.delete(:error) || get_attr_error(f, attr)
help_inline = help_inline(options.delete(:help_inline), error)
help_inline += options[:help_inline_permanent] unless options[:help_inline_permanent].nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method select_f
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_f(f, attr, array, id, method, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
array = array.to_a.dup
disable_button = select_options.delete(:disable_button)
include_blank = select_options.delete(:include_blank)
disable_button_enabled = select_options.delete(:disable_button_enabled)
Method field
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def field(f, attr, options = {})
table_field = options.delete(:table_field)
error = options.delete(:error) || get_attr_error(f, attr)
help_inline = help_inline(options.delete(:help_inline), error)
help_inline += options[:help_inline_permanent] unless options[:help_inline_permanent].nil?
Method multiple_selects
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def multiple_selects(f, attr, associations, selected_ids, options = {}, html_options = {})
options[:size] = "col-md-10"
case attr
when :organizations
klass = Organization
Method password_f
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def password_f(f, attr, options = {})
unset_button = options.delete(:unset)
value = f.object[attr] if options.delete(:keep_value)
password_field_tag(:fakepassword, value, :style => 'display: none', :autocomplete => 'new-password-fake') +
field(f, attr, options) do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method multiple_selects
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def multiple_selects(f, attr, associations, selected_ids, options = {}, html_options = {})
options[:size] = "col-md-10"
case attr
when :organizations
klass = Organization
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method select_f
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_f(f, attr, array, id, method, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method multiple_selects
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def multiple_selects(f, attr, associations, selected_ids, options = {}, html_options = {})
Method multiple_checkboxes
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def multiple_checkboxes(f, attr, klass, associations, options = {}, html_options = {})
Method submit_or_cancel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def submit_or_cancel(f, overwrite = false, args = { })
args[:cancel_path] ||= resource_path(controller_name)
cancel_btn = args[:react_cancel_button] ? react_cancel_button(args) : link_to(_("Cancel"), args[:cancel_path], :class => "btn btn-default")
content_tag(:div, :class => "clearfix") do
content_tag(:div, :class => "form-actions") do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method form_select_f
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def form_select_f(f, attr, array, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method time_zone_select_f
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def time_zone_select_f(f, attr, default_timezone, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method checkbox_f
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def checkbox_f(f, attr, options = {}, checked_value = "1", unchecked_value = "0")
Method link_to_add_fields
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def link_to_add_fields(name, f, association, partial = nil, options = {})
Method orderable_select_f
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orderable_select_f(f, attr, choices, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method selectable_f
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def selectable_f(f, attr, array, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method selectable_f_inline
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def selectable_f_inline(f, attr, array, select_options = {}, html_options = {})
Method add_label
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_label(options, f, attr)
return ''.html_safe if options[:label] == :none
label_size = options.delete(:label_size) || "col-md-2"
required_mark = check_required(options, f, attr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"