Method filter_encrypted has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filter_encrypted
audited_changes.each do |name, change|
next if change.nil? || change.to_s.empty?
if change.is_a? Array
change.map! { |c| c.to_s.start_with?(EncryptValue::ENCRYPTION_PREFIX) ? REDACTED : c }- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method log_audit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def log_audit
telemetry_increment_counter(:audit_records_created, 1, type: auditable_type)
audit_logger = Foreman::Logging.logger('audit')
return unless (audited_changes && audit_logger.info?)
audited_changes.each_pair do |attribute, change|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fix_auditable_type has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fix_auditable_type
# STI Host class should use the stub module instead of Host::Base
self.auditable_type = "Host::Base" if auditable_type =~ /^(::)?Host::/
self.associated_type = "Host::Base" if associated_type =~ /^(::)?Host::/
self.auditable_type = auditable.type if ["Taxonomy", "LookupKey"].include?(auditable_type) && auditable- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method taxed_and_untaxed has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def taxed_and_untaxed
clauses = []
if filter_taxonomy?(Organization)
clauses << org_join_arel[:taxonomy_id].in(user_taxonomy_ids(Organization))
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"