Method dhcp_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dhcp_attrs(record_mac)
raise ::Foreman::Exception.new(N_("DHCP not supported for this NIC")) unless dhcp?
dhcp_attr = {
:name => dhcp_record_name(record_mac),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
return true if ((old.ip != ip) ||
(old.hostname != hostname) ||
provision_mac_addresses_changed? ||
(old.subnet != subnet) ||
(old&.operatingsystem&.boot_filename(old.host) != operatingsystem&.boot_filename(host)) ||
Method dhcp_update_required?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dhcp_update_required?
# IP Address / name changed, or 'rebuild' action is triggered and DHCP record on the smart proxy is not present/identical.
return true if ((old.ip != ip) ||
(old.hostname != hostname) ||
provision_mac_addresses_changed? ||
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if !old.build? || (old.medium != medium || old.arch != arch) ||
(os && old.os && (old.os.name != os.name || old.os != os))
return true
end
Method queue_dhcp
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def queue_dhcp
return log_orchestration_errors unless (dhcp? || old&.dhcp?) && orchestration_errors?
queue_remove_dhcp_conflicts
new_record? ? queue_dhcp_create : queue_dhcp_update
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dhcp_conflict_detected?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dhcp_conflict_detected?
# we can't do any dhcp based validations when our MAC address is defined afterwards (e.g. in vm creation)
return false if mac.blank? || hostname.blank?
return false unless dhcp?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"