tlsfuzzer/tlslite-ng

View on GitHub

Showing 1,708 of 1,708 total issues

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _clientGetServerHello. (82)
Open

    def _clientGetServerHello(self, settings, session, clientHello):
        client_hello_hash = self._handshake_hash.copy()
        for result in self._getMsg(ContentType.handshake,
                                   HandshakeType.server_hello):
            if result in (0,1): yield result
Severity: Minor
Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _getMsg. (81)
Open

    def _getMsg(self, expectedType, secondaryType=None, constructorType=None):
        try:
            if not isinstance(expectedType, tuple):
                expectedType = (expectedType,)

Severity: Minor
Found in tlslite/tlsrecordlayer.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _clientTLS13Handshake. (78)
Open

    def _clientTLS13Handshake(self, settings, session, clientHello,
                              clientCertChain, privateKey, serverHello):
        """Perform TLS 1.3 handshake as a client."""
        prfName, prf_size = self._getPRFParams(serverHello.cipher_suite)

Severity: Minor
Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _handshakeClientAsyncHelper. (74)
Open

    def _handshakeClientAsyncHelper(self, srpParams, certParams, anonParams,
                               session, settings, serverName, nextProtos,
                               reqTack, alpn):

        self._handshakeStart(client=True)
Severity: Minor
Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

Cyclomatic Complexity

Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

File handshakesettings.py has 670 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# Authors:
#   Trevor Perrin
#   Dave Baggett (Arcode Corporation) - cleanup handling of constants
#   Yngve Pettersen (ported by Paul Sokolovsky) - TLS 1.2
#
Severity: Major
Found in tlslite/handshakesettings.py - About 1 day to fix

    Function _server_select_certificate has a Cognitive Complexity of 73 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _server_select_certificate(self, settings, client_hello,
                                       cipher_suites, cert_chain,
                                       private_key, version):
            """
            This method makes the decision on which certificate/key pair,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _clientSendClientHello. (68)
    Open

        def _clientSendClientHello(self, settings, session, srpUsername,
                                    srpParams, certParams, anonParams,
                                    serverName, nextProtos, reqTack, alpn):
            #Initialize acceptable ciphersuites
            cipherSuites = [CipherSuite.TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function _clientSendClientHello has a Cognitive Complexity of 70 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _clientSendClientHello(self, settings, session, srpUsername,
                                    srpParams, certParams, anonParams,
                                    serverName, nextProtos, reqTack, alpn):
            #Initialize acceptable ciphersuites
            cipherSuites = [CipherSuite.TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function _sigHashesToList has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def _sigHashesToList(settings, privateKey=None, certList=None,
                             version=(3, 3)):
            """Convert list of valid signature hashes to array of tuples"""
            certType = None
            publicKey = None
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/pycrypto_aes.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/pycrypto_tripledes.py on lines 0..29

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 159.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/pycrypto_tripledes.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/pycrypto_aes.py on lines 0..29

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 159.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                    if signature_scheme in (SignatureScheme.ed25519,
                            SignatureScheme.ed448):
                        pad_type = None
                        hash_name = "intrinsic"
                        salt_len = None
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/tlsrecordlayer.py on lines 756..773

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 157.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                if sig_scheme in (SignatureScheme.ed25519, SignatureScheme.ed448):
                    pad_type = None
                    hash_name = "intrinsic"
                    salt_len = None
                    sig_func = p_key.hashAndSign
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/tlsrecordlayer.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/tlsconnection.py on lines 1526..1544

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 157.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Function readAsync has a Cognitive Complexity of 66 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def readAsync(self, max=None, min=1):
            """Start a read operation on the TLS connection.
    
            This function returns a generator which behaves similarly to
            read().  Successive invocations of the generator will return 0
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsrecordlayer.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    kInsertLengthPrefixCode = [
       Prefix(0, 0), Prefix(1, 0), Prefix(2, 0), Prefix(3, 0),
       Prefix(4, 0), Prefix(5, 0), Prefix(6, 1), Prefix(8, 1),
       Prefix(10, 2), Prefix(14, 2), Prefix(18, 3), Prefix(26, 3),
       Prefix(34, 4), Prefix(50, 4), Prefix(66, 5), Prefix(98, 5),
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/brotlidecpy/prefix.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/brotlidecpy/prefix.py on lines 36..42

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 150.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

    kCopyLengthPrefixCode = [
       Prefix(2, 0), Prefix(3, 0), Prefix(4, 0), Prefix(5, 0),
       Prefix(6, 0), Prefix(7, 0), Prefix(8, 0), Prefix(9, 0),
       Prefix(10, 1), Prefix(12, 1), Prefix(14, 2), Prefix(18, 2),
       Prefix(22, 3), Prefix(30, 3), Prefix(38, 4), Prefix(54, 4),
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/brotlidecpy/prefix.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/brotlidecpy/prefix.py on lines 28..34

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 150.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _clientKeyExchange. (60)
    Open

        def _clientKeyExchange(self, settings, cipherSuite,
                               clientCertChain, privateKey,
                               certificateType,
                               tackExt, clientRandom, serverRandom,
                               keyExchange):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method _serverCertKeyExchange. (59)
    Open

        def _serverCertKeyExchange(self, clientHello, serverHello, sigHashAlg,
                                    serverCertChain, keyExchange,
                                    reqCert, reqCAs, cipherSuite,
                                    settings):
            #Send ServerHello, Certificate or Compressed Certificate
    Severity: Minor
    Found in tlslite/tlsconnection.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def _init_context(self, encrypt=True):
                if len(self._key) == 16:
                    cipherType = m2.aes_128_cbc()
                if len(self._key) == 24:
                    cipherType = m2.aes_192_cbc()
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/openssl_aes.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/openssl_aes.py on lines 112..123

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 137.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def _init_context(self, encrypt=True):
                if len(self.key) == 16:
                    cipherType = m2.aes_128_ctr()
                if len(self.key) == 24:
                    cipherType = m2.aes_192_ctr()
    Severity: Major
    Found in tlslite/utils/openssl_aes.py and 1 other location - About 1 day to fix
    tlslite/utils/openssl_aes.py on lines 51..62

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 137.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language