Showing 120 of 120 total issues
Function createAliases
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createAliases(cwd, sourceDirectory) {
/* istanbul ignore next */
const CWD = cwd || process.cwd();
const result = getWorkspacesAndExtensions(CWD);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const buffers = [
Buffer.from(
Array.from({ length: 100 })
.fill('')
.map((_, i) => `key${i}=value${i}`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const buffers = [
Buffer.from(
Array.from({ length: 900 })
.fill('')
.map((_, i) => `key${i}=value${i}`)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function lint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function lint(patterns, options) {
const flags = { ...options };
const eslintConfig = getESLintConfig(flags);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function docks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function docks(filepath, options) {
const { fileHeading, pkgRoot } = { fileHeading: false, ...options };
const relativePath = path.relative(pkgRoot, filepath);
const heading = fileHeading ? '#' : '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function contents
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
.reduce((acc, comment) => {
const locUrl = `${relativePath}#L${comment.code.loc.start.line}`;
const tagName = comment.tags.find((tag) => tag.title === 'name');
const tags = tagName
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (
// if `jest-runner.config.js` not found
!result ||
// or found
(result && // but // the `rollup` property is not an object
Function _createInBandTestRun
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_createInBandTestRun(
tests,
watcher,
onStart,
onResult,
Function parseBody
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function* parseBody(ctx, options, next) {
const fields = typeof options.fields === 'string' ? options.fields : 'fields';
const files = typeof options.files === 'string' ? options.files : 'files';
const { custom } = options.extendTypes;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function multipart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function multipart(req, options = {}) {
const ct = req.headers['content-type'];
if (!/multipart/i.test(ct)) {
throw new TypeError('Failed to fetch');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
createToken(
'MAINVERSION',
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIER]})\\.` +
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIER]})\\.` +
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIER]})`,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
createToken(
'MAINVERSIONLOOSE',
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIERLOOSE]})\\.` +
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIERLOOSE]})\\.` +
`(${src[t.NUMERICIDENTIFIERLOOSE]})`,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function getWorkspacesAndExtensions
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function getWorkspacesAndExtensions(rootDir) {
/* istanbul ignore next */
const cwd = rootDir || process.cwd();
const fromRoot = (...x) => path.resolve(cwd, ...x);
const packageJsonPath = fromRoot('package.json');
Function defaultOptions
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function defaultOptions(options = {}) {
const cfg = { ...options };
const types = defaultTypes(cfg.extendTypes);
const opts = extend(
Function parseBody
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function* parseBody(ctx, options, next) {
const fields = typeof options.fields === 'string' ? options.fields : 'fields';
const files = typeof options.files === 'string' ? options.files : 'files';
const { custom } = options.extendTypes;
Function main
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default async function main(settings = {}) {
const { cwd, path, fs, env, asia, loadConfig, nextTick } = settings;
const configPath = path.resolve(cwd, 'asia.config.js');
const config = await loadConfig(configPath);
const cfg = { cwd, path, fs, env, ...config };
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = runner('babel', async (ctx) => {
const start = Date.now();
const { testPath, config, runnerName, runnerConfig, memoizer } = ctx;
let options = runnerConfig;
const cfgs = [options].flat().filter(Boolean);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function exports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = runner('eslint', async (ctx) => {
const start = Date.now();
const { testPath, config, runnerConfig, memoizer } = ctx;
const options = normalizeOptions(runnerConfig, config.rootDir);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function multipart
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function multipart(opts) {
const ctx = this;
return function thunk(done) {
const fields = {};
Function packageJson
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default async function packageJson(packageName, endpoint) {
const { name, version } = parsePkgName(packageName);
const tag = version === '' ? 'latest' : version;
const uri =
typeof endpoint === 'function'