Showing 120 of 120 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function pass({ start, end, test }) {
return toTestResult({
stats: {
failures: 0,
pending: 0,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 108.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function exports
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = runner('eslint', async (ctx) => {
const start = Date.now();
const { testPath, config, runnerConfig, memoizer } = ctx;
const options = normalizeOptions(runnerConfig, config.rootDir);
Function testCoverage
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function testCoverage(rootDir, testCovPath) {
const {
packageJsonPath,
packageJson: pkg,
isMonorepo: isMono,
Function multipart
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function multipart(req, options = {}) {
const ct = req.headers['content-type'];
if (!/multipart/i.test(ct)) {
throw new TypeError('Failed to fetch');
Function globCacheStream
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
globCache.stream = async function* globCacheStream(options) {
const settings = { ...options };
const opts = {
buffered: false,
cwd: process.cwd(),
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const baseOptions = {
config: test.context.config,
globalConfig: this._globalConfig,
testPath: test.path,
rawModuleMap: watcher.isWatchMode()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const baseOptions = {
config: test.context.config,
globalConfig: this._globalConfig,
testPath: test.path,
rawModuleMap: watcher.isWatchMode()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function allModulePaths
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function allModulePaths(options = {}) {
const { paths } = { paths: [], ...options };
assert(Array.isArray(paths), 'expect options.paths to be string[]');
Function exports
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = runner('babel', async (ctx) => {
const start = Date.now();
const { testPath, config, runnerName, runnerConfig, memoizer } = ctx;
let options = runnerConfig;
const cfgs = [options].flat().filter(Boolean);
File runner.js
has 273 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const crypto = require('crypto');
const builtins = require('builtin-modules');
File main.js
has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
/* eslint-disable unicorn/prefer-module */
'use strict';
Function _createParallelTestRun
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_createParallelTestRun(
tests,
watcher,
onStart,
onResult,
Function globCacheStream
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
globCache.stream = async function* globCacheStream(options) {
const settings = { ...options };
const opts = {
buffered: false,
cwd: process.cwd(),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function docks
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function docks(filepath, options) {
const { fileHeading, pkgRoot } = { fileHeading: false, ...options };
const relativePath = path.relative(pkgRoot, filepath);
const heading = fileHeading ? '#' : '';
Function wrapper
has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function wrapper(runnerName, runnerFn) {
assert.strictEqual(
typeof runnerName,
'string',
'expect runnerName to be a string',
Function outfile
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const outfile = await utils.tryCatch(async () => {
const resDocs = docks(testPath, { ...docksConfig, pkgRoot });
apidocsContent = resDocs.contents;
if (apidocsContent.length === 0 && !docksConfig.force) {
Function lint
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export async function lint(patterns, options) {
const flags = { ...options };
const eslintConfig = getESLintConfig(flags);
Function tryLoadConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async function tryLoadConfig({ testPath, config: jestConfig, start }) {
const cfg = await tryCatch(testPath, start, () => {
let result = null;
result = jestRunnerConfig.search();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function babelPresetOptimize
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module.exports = function babelPresetOptimize(api, options) {
api.assertVersion(7);
// NOTE: minifyBuiltins: true might output a bigger output - it depends, try your codebase.
const opts = {
Function parse
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse(text, _, options) {
let txt = text;
if (options.filepath && /package\.json$/.test(options.filepath)) {
txt = sortPackageJson(txt, {