Showing 72 of 96 total issues
Function updateEmailServices
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async updateEmailServices() {
try {
const totalUsers = await User.countDocuments({})
let dripSubscribers = []
let mailJetContacts = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateRankingMessage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateRankingMessage({ ranking, user, userRanking, monthName }) {
if (!ranking || ranking.length < 5)
return 'Ops. Ainda não temos dados suficientes para gerar o ranking neste momento. :/'
const type = monthName ? `de ${monthName}` : 'geral'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function scoreReactionRemoved
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async scoreReactionRemoved({ sender, receiver, reaction }) {
try {
const options = {
runValidators: true,
upsert: true,
Function handleClickOnProduct
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const handleClickOnProduct = async data => {
try {
const { properties, impulser_uuid, time } = data
if (!properties.name || !Object.keys(products).includes(properties.name))
Function handleGivePoints
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async handleGivePoints({ user, provider, content }) {
try {
if (!user.isCoreTeam) {
return BotController.sendMessageToUser({
provider: provider.name,
Function getDailyScore
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
scoreSchema.statics.getDailyScore = async function (uuid) {
const result = await this.aggregate([
{
$match: {
user: uuid,
Function generateRankingMessage
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateRankingMessage({ ranking, user, userRanking, monthName }) {
if (!ranking || ranking.length < 5)
return 'Ops. Ainda não temos dados suficientes para gerar o ranking neste momento. :/'
const type = monthName ? `de ${monthName}` : 'geral'
Function handleProfileCompleteness
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async handleProfileCompleteness(payload) {
try {
const { uuid, completeness, provider } = payload
let user = await User.findOne({ uuid })
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handle
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async handle(payload) {
try {
const { provider } = payload
const user = await User.findOne({
[`${provider.name}.id`]: provider.user.id
Function formatUser
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const formatUser = data => {
const {
uuid,
status,
fullname,
Function sendMonthlyRankingToChannel
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async sendMonthlyRankingToChannel() {
try {
const { ranking } = await RankingController.getMonthlyRanking({
offset: 0,
size: 5
Function sendMessage
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async sendMessage({ user, provider, mentions, channels, content }) {
try {
if (!user.isCoreTeam) {
return BotController.sendMessageToUser({
provider: provider.name,
Function scoreReactionSended
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async scoreReactionSended({ sender, reaction, payload, alreadyAchieved }) {
try {
if (await this.reactionSendedCannotScore({ reaction, payload })) return
await Score.create({
user: sender.uuid,
Function removeEmptyValues
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const removeEmptyValues = obj => {
Object.keys(obj).forEach(function (key) {
if (obj[key] && typeof obj[key] === 'object') {
if (Object.keys(obj[key]).length) {
removeEmptyValues(obj[key])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function givePoints
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async givePoints({ user, usernames, provider, points, reason }) {
const response = {
msg: 'Eis o resultado do seu comando: ',
attachments: []
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async handle(payload) {
try {
const { isNew, user } = await User.createOrUpdate(payload)
if (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const alreadyScoreOnReaction = await Score.findOne({
description: scoreTypes.reactionReceived,
'details.messageId': reaction.provider.messageId,
'details.sender': reaction.user,
user: receiver.uuid
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const { deletedCount } = await Score.deleteMany({
description: scoreTypes.reactionSended,
'details.messageId': reaction.provider.messageId,
'details.content': reaction.content,
user: reaction.user
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!user.isCoreTeam) {
return BotController.sendMessageToUser({
provider: provider.name,
message: 'Opa, você *não tem acesso* a esta operação.',
username: provider.user.username
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!user.isCoreTeam) {
return BotController.sendMessageToUser({
provider: provider.name,
message: 'Opa, você *não tem acesso* a esta operação.',
username: provider.user.username
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76