Method Virtualizer.Bind
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *Virtualizer) Bind(args string, i int, j int, protocol string, port virtualizers.RouteMap, networkType string) (string, string, bool, error) {
Method Virtualizer.initializeNetworkCards
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *Virtualizer) initializeNetworkCards() ([]string, error) {
v.logger.Debugf("Initializing Network Cards")
var nicArgs string
var err error
var nr string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createArgs
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func createArgs(cpus uint, memory int, headless bool, diskpath string, diskformat string) string {
Method Virtualizer.initializeNetworkCards
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (v *Virtualizer) initializeNetworkCards() ([]string, error) {
v.logger.Debugf("Initializing Network Cards")
var nicArgs string
var err error
var nr string
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *operation) finished(err error) {
o.finishedLock.Lock()
defer o.finishedLock.Unlock()
if o.isFinished {
return
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 164.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *Virtualizer) Download() (vio.File, error) {
v.logger.Debugf("Downloading Disk")
if !(v.state == virtualizers.Ready) {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("the machine must be in a stopped or ready state")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 128.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (v *Virtualizer) Details() (string, string, string, []virtualizers.NetworkInterface, time.Time, *vcfg.VCFG, interface{}) {
return v.name, v.pname, v.state, v.routes, v.created, v.config, v.source
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 103.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a newline Open
return errors.New("vm is already stopped.")
- Exclude checks
error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a newline Open
if err != nil && err.Error() != fmt.Errorf("The pipe is being closed.").Error() && err.Error() != fmt.Errorf("write unix @->%s: write: broken pipe", filepath.ToSlash(filepath.Join(v.folder, "monitor.sock"))).Error() {
- Exclude checks
error strings should not be capitalized or end with punctuation or a newline Open
if err != nil && err.Error() != fmt.Errorf("The pipe is being closed.").Error() && err.Error() != fmt.Errorf("write unix ->%s: write: broken pipe", filepath.ToSlash(filepath.Join(v.folder, "monitor.sock"))).Error() && err.Error() != fmt.Errorf("write unix @->%s: write: broken pipe", filepath.ToSlash(filepath.Join(v.folder, "monitor.sock"))).Error() {
- Exclude checks
exported method Virtualizer.Bind should have comment or be unexported Open
func (v *Virtualizer) Bind(args string, i int, j int, protocol string, port virtualizers.RouteMap, networkType string) (string, string, bool, error) {
- Exclude checks