wearefine/fae

View on GitHub

Showing 1,556 of 1,556 total issues

Perceived complexity for fae_pulldown is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def fae_pulldown(f, attribute, options={})
      raise "Fae::MissingRequiredOption: fae_pulldown requires a 'collection' when using it on an ActiveRecord attribute." if !options.has_key?(:collection) && f.object.attribute_names.include?(attribute.to_s)
      raise "Fae::ImproperOptionValue: The value #{options[:size]} is not a valid option for 'size'. Please use 'short' or 'long'." if options[:size].present? && ['short','long'].include?(options[:size]) == false
      raise "Fae::ImproperOptionValue: The value #{options[:search]} is not a valid option for 'search'. Please use a Boolean." if options[:search].present? && !!options[:search] != options[:search]

Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/fae/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for td_columns is too high. [9/6]
Open

    def td_columns(params)
      attribute = params[:col]
      attributes = params[:cols]
      item = params[:item]

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method has too many lines. [13/10]
Open

    def fae_filter_select(attribute, opts = {})
      options = prepare_options_for_filter_select(attribute, opts)
      # grouped_by takes priority over grouped_options
      if options[:grouped_by].present?
        select_options = filter_generate_select_group(options[:collection], options[:grouped_by], options[:label_method])
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/fae/view_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Perceived complexity for td_columns is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def td_columns(params)
      attribute = params[:col]
      attributes = params[:cols]
      item = params[:item]

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Perceived complexity for change_item_link is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def change_item_link(change)
      text = "#{change.changeable_type.gsub('Fae::','')}: "
      test_source_method = :data_source_exists?

      if change.changeable_type.exclude?('Fae') && change.changeable_type.exclude?('Page') && !ActiveRecord::Base.connection.send(test_source_method, change.changeable_type.tableize)

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for clone_has_one_relationship is too high. [9/6]
Open

    def clone_has_one_relationship(association,type)
      old_record = @item.send(association)

      if old_record.present?
        new_record = old_record.dup

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Assignment Branch Condition size for clone_join_relationships is too high. [18.06/15]
Open

    def clone_join_relationships(object)
      if @item.send(object.to_sym).present?
        @item.send(object.to_sym).reverse.each do |record|
          copied_join = object.classify.constantize.find_by_id(record.id).dup
          copied_join.send("#{@klass_singular}_id" + '=', @cloned_item.id)

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Assignment Branch Condition size for index is too high. [18.14/15]
Open

    def index
      if use_pagination
        @items = @klass.for_fae_index.page(params[:page])
      else
        @items = @klass.for_fae_index

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Perceived complexity for clone_has_one_relationship is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def clone_has_one_relationship(association,type)
      old_record = @item.send(association)

      if old_record.present?
        new_record = old_record.dup

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Method has too many lines. [13/10]
Open

    def create
      return create_from_existing(params[:from_existing]) if params[:from_existing].present?

      @item = @klass.new(item_params)

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Perceived complexity for set_globals is too high. [10/7]
Open

    def set_globals
      if attributes.present?
        attributes.each do |arg|
          # prevent these from being in attributes_flat or attribute_names as they are not real model generator field options
          if is_attachment(arg)

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for validate_each is too high. [9/6]
Open

  def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
    raise(ArgumentError, "A CarrierWave::Uploader::Base object was expected") unless value.kind_of? CarrierWave::Uploader::Base

    value = (options[:tokenizer] || DEFAULT_TOKENIZER).call(value) if value.kind_of?(String)

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/file_size_validator.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method setup_dynamic_singleton has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def self.setup_dynamic_singleton
      return if @singleton_is_setup

      fae_fields.each do |name, value|
        type = value.is_a?(Hash) ? value[:type] : value
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/fae/static_page.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity for fae_grouped_select is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def fae_grouped_select(f, attribute, options={})
      raise "Fae::MissingRequiredOption: fae_grouped_select requires a `collection` option or `groups` and `labels` options." if !options.has_key?(:collection) && !options.has_key?(:groups) && !options.has_key?(:labels)
      raise "Fae::MissingRequiredOption: fae_grouped_select required a `labels` option with a value containing an array when using the `groups` option." if options[:groups].present? && options[:labels].blank?
      raise "Fae::MissingRequiredOption: fae_grouped_select required a `groups` option with a value containing an array when using the `labels` option." if options[:labels].present? && options[:groups].blank?

Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/fae/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Perceived complexity for col_name_or_image is too high. [9/7]
Open

    def col_name_or_image(item, attribute)
      value = item.send(attribute)
      return if value.blank?
      # if item is an image
      if value.class.name == 'Fae::Image'

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Assignment Branch Condition size for netlify_enabled? is too high. [17.72/15]
Open

    def netlify_enabled?
      Fae.netlify.present? &&
      Fae.netlify[:api_user].present? &&
      Fae.netlify[:api_token].present? &&
      Fae.netlify[:site].present? &&

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method has too many lines. [12/10]
Open

    def set_file
      if have_file?
        case original_resource_mounter.send(:storage).class.name
        when 'CarrierWave::Storage::File'
          set_file_for_local_storage

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method has too many lines. [12/10]
Open

    def label_and_hint(attribute, options)
      hint = options[:hint]

      options[:helper_text] = attempt_common_helper_text(attribute) if options[:helper_text].blank?

Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/fae/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Cyclomatic complexity for col_name_or_image is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def col_name_or_image(item, attribute)
      value = item.send(attribute)
      return if value.blank?
      # if item is an image
      if value.class.name == 'Fae::Image'

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method has too many lines. [12/10]
Open

    def create_from_existing(id)
      @item = @klass.find(id)
      @cloned_item = @item.dup
      update_cloned_attributes(@cloned_item)
      @cloned_item.on_prod = false if @item.respond_to?(:on_prod)

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language