Showing 2,519 of 2,519 total issues
Method getViewProperties
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private List<ViewCSSProperty> getViewProperties() {
if (mViewProperties == null) {
synchronized (this) {
if (mViewProperties == null) {
List<ViewCSSProperty> props = new ArrayList<>();
Method onCreateView
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public View onCreateView(LayoutInflater inflater, ViewGroup container,
Bundle savedInstanceState) {
// Inflate the layout for this fragment
rootView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.fragment_js_log, container, false);
Function created
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
created: function() {
var bundleUrl = this.$getConfig().bundleUrl;
console.log('hit', bundleUrl);
var dirs = this.root.split('/');
dirs.forEach(function(dir, index) {
Function created
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
created: function() {
var bundleUrl = this.$getConfig().bundleUrl;
console.log('hit', bundleUrl);
var dirs = this.root.split('/');
dirs.forEach(function(dir, index) {
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testTextType
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testTextType(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Text")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Text find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method testDowngrade
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void testDowngrade(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Downgrade")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Downgrade find");
Method responseHeadersReceived
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void responseHeadersReceived(InspectorResponse response) {
NetworkPeerManager peerManager = getPeerManagerIfEnabled();
if (peerManager != null) {
Network.Response responseJSON = new Network.Response();
Method Slider
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void Slider(){
for(final View caseView : mCaseListIndexView){
if (((WXTextView)caseView).getText().toString().equals("TC_Slider")){
Log.e(TAG, "TC_Slider find");
Function data
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
data: function () {return {
appearMin:1,
appearMax:1,
appearIds:[],
rows:[
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void move(int x, int y) {
final Activity activity = ActivityTracker.get().tryGetTopActivity();
if (activity != null) {
final MotionEvent move = MotionEvent.obtain(
downTime, System.currentTimeMillis(),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private void up(int x, int y) {
final Activity activity = ActivityTracker.get().tryGetTopActivity();
if (activity != null) {
final MotionEvent up = MotionEvent.obtain(
downTime, System.currentTimeMillis(),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 96.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method intercept
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
String requestId = String.valueOf(mNextRequestId.getAndIncrement());
Request request = chain.request();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intercept
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
String requestId = String.valueOf(mNextRequestId.getAndIncrement());
Request request = chain.request();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method onGetChildren
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected void onGetChildren(AndroidDocumentRoot element, Accumulator<Object> children) {
if (DOM.isNativeMode()) {
children.store(mApplication);
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"