Sign upLogin

werf/trdl

View on GitHub
Star
server/path_release.go

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage
F
26%

Method Backend.pathRelease has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (b *Backend) pathRelease(ctx context.Context, req *logical.Request, fields *framework.FieldData) (*logical.Response, error) {
    if errResp := util.CheckRequiredFields(req, fields); errResp != nil {
        return errResp, nil
    }
Severity: Minor
Found in server/path_release.go - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method Backend.pathRelease has 109 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (b *Backend) pathRelease(ctx context.Context, req *logical.Request, fields *framework.FieldData) (*logical.Response, error) {
    if errResp := util.CheckRequiredFields(req, fields); errResp != nil {
        return errResp, nil
    }
Severity: Major
Found in server/path_release.go - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method Backend.pathRelease has 18 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
    Open

    func (b *Backend) pathRelease(ctx context.Context, req *logical.Request, fields *framework.FieldData) (*logical.Response, error) {
    if errResp := util.CheckRequiredFields(req, fields); errResp != nil {
        return errResp, nil
    }
    Severity: Major
    Found in server/path_release.go - About 1 hr to fix

      Function buildReleaseArtifacts has 58 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      func buildReleaseArtifacts(ctx context.Context, tarWriter *nio.PipeWriter, gitRepo *git.Repository, fromImage string, runCommands []string, logger hclog.Logger) (error, func() error) {
    cli, err := client.NewClientWithOpts(client.FromEnv, client.WithAPIVersionNegotiation())
    if err != nil {
        return fmt.Errorf("unable to create docker client: %w", err), nil
    }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in server/path_release.go - About 1 hr to fix

        Function buildReleaseArtifacts has 9 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed).
        Open

        func buildReleaseArtifacts(ctx context.Context, tarWriter *nio.PipeWriter, gitRepo *git.Repository, fromImage string, runCommands []string, logger hclog.Logger) (error, func() error) {
    cli, err := client.NewClientWithOpts(client.FromEnv, client.WithAPIVersionNegotiation())
    if err != nil {
        return fmt.Errorf("unable to create docker client: %w", err), nil
    }
        Severity: Major
        Found in server/path_release.go - About 55 mins to fix

          Function buildReleaseArtifacts has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          func buildReleaseArtifacts(ctx context.Context, tarWriter *nio.PipeWriter, gitRepo *git.Repository, fromImage string, runCommands []string, logger hclog.Logger) (error, func() error) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in server/path_release.go - About 45 mins to fix

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

            func cloneGitRepositoryTag(url, gitTag, username, password string) (*git.Repository, error) {
    cloneGitOptions := trdlGit.CloneOptions{
        TagName:           gitTag,
        RecurseSubmodules: git.DefaultSubmoduleRecursionDepth,
    }
            Severity: Major
            Found in server/path_release.go and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            server/path_publish.go on lines 309..328

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 139.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status