Method FileReader.walkFilesWithPathMatcher
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) walkFilesWithPathMatcher(ctx context.Context, relDir string, pathMatcher path_matcher.PathMatcher, skipFileFunc func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error), fileFunc func(notResolvedPath string) error) error {
if !pathMatcher.IsDirOrSubmodulePathMatched(relDir) {
return nil
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method FileReader.resolveFilePath
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) resolveFilePath(ctx context.Context, relPath string, depth int, checkSymlinkTargetFunc func(resolvedPath string) error) (string, error) {
if depth > 1000 {
return "", fmt.Errorf("too many levels of symbolic links")
}
depth++
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
FileReader
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) projectRelativePathToAbsolutePath(relPath string) string {
return filepath.Join(r.sharedOptions.ProjectDir(), relPath)
}
Method FileReader.walkFilesWithPathMatcher
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) walkFilesWithPathMatcher(ctx context.Context, relDir string, pathMatcher path_matcher.PathMatcher, skipFileFunc func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error), fileFunc func(notResolvedPath string) error) error {
if !pathMatcher.IsDirOrSubmodulePathMatched(relDir) {
return nil
}
Method FileReader.checkFileExistenceAndAcceptance
has 12 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r FileReader) checkFileExistenceAndAcceptance(ctx context.Context, relPath string, isFileAcceptedCheckFunc func(relPath string) bool) error {
if r.sharedOptions.LooseGiterminism() {
exist, err := r.IsRegularFileExist(ctx, relPath)
if err != nil {
return err
Method FileReader.resolveFilePath
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) resolveFilePath(ctx context.Context, relPath string, depth int, checkSymlinkTargetFunc func(resolvedPath string) error) (string, error) {
if depth > 1000 {
return "", fmt.Errorf("too many levels of symbolic links")
}
depth++
Method FileReader.resolveFilePath
has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r FileReader) resolveFilePath(ctx context.Context, relPath string, depth int, checkSymlinkTargetFunc func(resolvedPath string) error) (string, error) {
if depth > 1000 {
return "", fmt.Errorf("too many levels of symbolic links")
}
depth++
Method FileReader.listFilesWithGlob
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r FileReader) listFilesWithGlob(ctx context.Context, relDir, glob string, skipFileFunc func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error)) ([]string, error) {
var prefixWithoutPatterns string
prefixWithoutPatterns, glob = util.GlobPrefixWithoutPatterns(glob)
relDirOrFileWithGlobPart := filepath.Join(relDir, prefixWithoutPatterns)
Method FileReader.walkFilesWithPathMatcher
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r FileReader) walkFilesWithPathMatcher(ctx context.Context, relDir string, pathMatcher path_matcher.PathMatcher, skipFileFunc func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error), fileFunc func(notResolvedPath string) error) error {
if !pathMatcher.IsDirOrSubmodulePathMatched(relDir) {
return nil
}
Method FileReader.walkFilesWithPathMatcher
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) walkFilesWithPathMatcher(ctx context.Context, relDir string, pathMatcher path_matcher.PathMatcher, skipFileFunc func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error), fileFunc func(notResolvedPath string) error) error {
Method FileReader.skipFileFunc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) skipFileFunc(acceptedFilePathMatcher path_matcher.PathMatcher) func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error) {
return func(ctx context.Context, r FileReader, existingRelPath string) (bool, error) {
if filepath.Base(existingRelPath) == ".git" {
return true, nil
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) CheckFileExistenceAndAcceptance(ctx context.Context, relPath string, isFileAcceptedCheckFunc func(relPath string) bool) (err error) {
logboek.Context(ctx).Debug().
LogBlock("CheckFileExistenceAndAcceptance %q", relPath).
Options(func(options types.LogBlockOptionsInterface) {
if !debug() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 199.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) IsRegularFileExist(ctx context.Context, relPath string) (exist bool, err error) {
logboek.Context(ctx).Debug().
LogBlock("IsRegularFileExist %q", relPath).
Options(func(options types.LogBlockOptionsInterface) {
if !debug() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 186.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) IsDirectoryExist(ctx context.Context, relPath string) (exist bool, err error) {
logboek.Context(ctx).Debug().
LogBlock("IsDirectoryExist %q", relPath).
Options(func(options types.LogBlockOptionsInterface) {
if !debug() {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 186.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) isDirectoryExist(ctx context.Context, relPath string) (bool, error) {
resolvedPath, err := r.ResolveFilePath(ctx, relPath)
if err != nil {
if IsFileNotFoundInProjectDirectoryError(err) {
return false, nil
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 150.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func (r FileReader) isRegularFileExist(ctx context.Context, relPath string) (bool, error) {
resolvedPath, err := r.ResolveFilePath(ctx, relPath)
if err != nil {
if IsFileNotFoundInProjectDirectoryError(err) {
return false, nil
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 150.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76