Showing 17 of 17 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
spamCheck(...addressList) {
addressList = flatten(addressList);
const method_name = 'spam_check';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
backlinksCheck(...domains) {
domains = flatten(domains);
const method_name = 'backlinks_check';
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 125.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function constructor
has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor({data, options, aliases, request} = {}) {
if (request) {
assert(request instanceof IncomingMessage, 'Request argument must be instance of http.ClientRequest.');
}
Function server
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const server = http.createServer((request, res) => {
const {pathname, query} = url.parse(request.url);
log('PATH', pathname);
switch (true) {
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor({data, options, aliases, request} = {}) {
if (request) {
assert(request instanceof IncomingMessage, 'Request argument must be instance of http.ClientRequest.');
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function requestMethod
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[requestMethod] (requestUrl, data) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const info = url.parse(requestUrl);
Function constructor
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(responseData = {}) {
assert.equal(typeof responseData, 'object', 'Argument responseData must be an object');
let {
Function checkMessage
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkMessage({sender_email, sender_ip, js_on, submit_time, all_headers, sender_nickname, message, sender_info, post_info, stoplist_check} = {}) {
assert(sender_email, 'Sender email argument (sender_email) is required.');
assert.equal(typeof sender_email, 'string', 'Sender email argument must be a string.');
Function parseBody
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
[parseBody](request, bodyType = QUERYSTRING_BODY_TYPE) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
if (request.method === 'GET') {
Function checkNewUser
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkNewUser({sender_email, sender_ip, js_on, submit_time, all_headers, sender_nickname, sender_info, tz, phone} = {}) {
assert(sender_email, 'Sender email argument (sender_email) is required.');
assert.equal(typeof sender_email, 'string', 'Sender email argument must be a string.');
Function formTemplate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const formTemplate = ({ errors, data }, auth_key) => {
const disabledBecauseNoKey = auth_key ? '' : 'disabled';
return `<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="UTF-8">
<title>Cleantalk demo - just try it!</title>
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
isAllowMessage(request) {
assert(request instanceof CleantalkRequest, 'Argument request must be instance of CleantalkRequest');
return request.ready.then(data => this.checkMessage(data));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
isAllowUser(request) {
assert(request instanceof CleantalkRequest, 'Argument request must be instance of CleantalkRequest');
return request.ready.then(data => this.checkMessage(data));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function checkMessage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkMessage({sender_email, sender_ip, js_on, submit_time, all_headers, sender_nickname, message, sender_info, post_info, stoplist_check} = {}) {
assert(sender_email, 'Sender email argument (sender_email) is required.');
assert.equal(typeof sender_email, 'string', 'Sender email argument must be a string.');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function checkNewUser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
checkNewUser({sender_email, sender_ip, js_on, submit_time, all_headers, sender_nickname, sender_info, tz, phone} = {}) {
assert(sender_email, 'Sender email argument (sender_email) is required.');
assert.equal(typeof sender_email, 'string', 'Sender email argument must be a string.');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function server
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const server = http.createServer((request, res) => {
const {pathname, query} = url.parse(request.url);
log('PATH', pathname);
switch (true) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function cleantalkMiddleware
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const cleantalkMiddleware = (auth_key, type, aliases, options) => {
options = options || {};
const {server_url, language} = options;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"